Budapest, 24 May 2018 – The Money Trail to Europe’s Future: the Multi-Annual Financial Framework and the EU’s priorities post-2020
Eulalia Rubio, senior Research Fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute, intervenes for a conference organised by the Center for European Neighbourhood Studies, in Budapest, with the aim to underline main objectives and priorities for the post-2020 European budget, and the foreseeable hurdles to negotiating process.
PARTNERSHIP
PARTENAIRES
The European Union is currently in the process of setting its priorities for most of the coming decade. The next Multi-Annual Financial Framework for after the year 2020 will define the Union’s priorities and goals, and Member States and EU institutions really have to commit substantial financial resources. As major beneficiaries and considering the current political situation, the countries of Central Europe will play a substantial role in these discussions. They are increasingly seeking to modernize their economies for the knowledge economies but still lag behind in securing research funding. They are also large agricultural producers substantially affected by any changes to the Common Agricultural Policy, which may voice their concerns and oppose a reduction of the part dedicated to agricultural subsidies. Last but not least, the demand Cohesion funds is still there, while the European Commission may decide to use the budgetary leverage as a response to Rule of Law threats observed in Poland and Hungary.
In order to shed the light and explain these crucial issues, Eulalia Rubio will have the opportunity to debate with Andrzej Sadecki, Research Fellow, Center for Eastern Studies (OSW), Zuzana Kasakova, Associate Research Fellow, EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, and Zsolt Darvas, Senior Fellow, Bruegel, Brussels
If you want more information on this event, you can consult the programme, enclosed to this announcement.
The European Union is currently in the process of setting its priorities for most of the coming decade. The next Multi-Annual Financial Framework for after the year 2020 will define the Union’s priorities and goals, and Member States and EU institutions really have to commit substantial financial resources. As major beneficiaries and considering the current political situation, the countries of Central Europe will play a substantial role in these discussions. They are increasingly seeking to modernize their economies for the knowledge economies but still lag behind in securing research funding. They are also large agricultural producers substantially affected by any changes to the Common Agricultural Policy, which may voice their concerns and oppose a reduction of the part dedicated to agricultural subsidies. Last but not least, the demand Cohesion funds is still there, while the European Commission may decide to use the budgetary leverage as a response to Rule of Law threats observed in Poland and Hungary.
In order to shed the light and explain these crucial issues, Eulalia Rubio will have the opportunity to debate with Andrzej Sadecki, Research Fellow, Center for Eastern Studies (OSW), Zuzana Kasakova, Associate Research Fellow, EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, and Zsolt Darvas, Senior Fellow, Bruegel, Brussels
If you want more information on this event, you can consult the programme, enclosed to this announcement.
Budapest
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
How stringent would the new Stability and Growth Pact be? And for who?
The tools for protecting the EU budget from breaches of the rule of law
Macro-economic impact of the EU Recovery Funds
THE NEXT REVISION OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION AND THE EU BUDGET GALAXY
From words to action
Between Francis and Viktor,
the tugs and pulls among Central European Catholics
The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?
What is left of the “Visegrád Group”?
A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented
An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead
The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”
Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU
Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?
Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus
Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique
Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response
The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?
MFF negotiations: towards the end?
‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity
An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda
Innovation for the energy & climate transition
European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?
Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme
Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?
InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?
Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget
They Love Me, They Love Me Not, They Love Me a Little: Public Opinion and the European Union in the Visegrad Countries
How Can Europe Repair Breaches of the Rule of Law?
Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution
The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility
EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?
Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”
The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding
The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?
Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?
The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?
Making the Energy Transition a European Success
Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe
Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?
Public Sector Reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it
Investment in Europe: Making the best of the Juncker Plan
Is there an alternative to the European economic policy? The European Parliament response
Federalising the Eurozone: Towards a true European budget?
What would a European finance minister do? A proposal
A new road map for the EU
The adjustements to the EU budget
National budgets and European surveillance: Shedding light on the debate
Reforming Europe’s governance
Adjustment programmes in the euro area: mission accomplished?
Who calls the shots in the euro area? “Brussels” or the member states?
Non-Community European spending
EU budget: the path to an agreement
The role and place of Parliaments in a genuine Economic and Monetary Union
EU and growth: three pacts rather than one
European budget 2014-2020: seven years of bad luck?
Is the stupidity pact still stable?
How to maintain hard capabilities in times of budget cuts?
The EU budget: taking a second look
Britain and Europe – The last rites?
Spending better together: analyses and recommendations
Reforming the EU budget in times of crisis
Eurozone budget: 3 functions, 3 instruments
Which Institutions for the Euro Area?
“Fiscal Compact”, sovereignty and austerity
What European budget for post-crisis Europe?
European Development Aid: How to be more effective without spending more?
European guarantees to get out of the crisis?
The European “Fiscal Compact”: a goal or a starting point?
EU budget negotiations: need for a healthy and constructive debate
The “Fiscal Compact”: legal uncertainty and political ambiguity
The ‘TSCG’: much ado about nothing?
A two-pronged defence of the Euro
The Common Strategic Framework: adding value to rural development?
Debt crisis, sovereignty crisis
The CAP in the EU Budget: New Objectives and Financial Principles for the Agricultural Budget after 2013
Rethinking EU finances in times of crisis
Thinking the EU budget and public spending in Europe: the need to use an aggregate approach
Defence spending in Europe: Can we do better without spending more?
The “added value” in EU budgetary debates: one concept, four meanings
Report Haug, Lamassoure, Verhofstadt: Europe for Growth : Towards a radical change in financing the EU
Options for an EU Financing Reform
Comments on the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”
Comments on the policy paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”
Comments to the policy paper “A New Budget for the European Union?” by A. Iozzo, S. Micossi and MT. Salvemini
Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”
Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”
Réaction à la note publiée par le CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”
Comments to the paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”
EU Budget Review: Addressing the Thorny Issues
The case for a European tax: Benefits, practical aspects and options for endowing the EU with a veritable own resource
The EU budget: What for?
Funding the EU Budget with a Genuine Own Resource: The case for a European Tax
Budgetary discipline and macroeconomic policy in the European Union
Reform of EU policies in the perspective of enlargement and their financial implications
European budget : the poisonous budget rebate debate
The Lisbon strategy and the open method of co-ordination: 12 recommendations for an effective multi-level strategy
Rule of law conditionality
MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Peut-on parvenir à une souveraineté économique européenne?
FRANCE : L’UNION DES INDUSTRIES UTILISATRICES D’ÉNERGIE (UNIDEN) APPELLE AU RATIONNEMENT
Le nouveau «plan de résilience» teste la solidarité européenne
