Other document
15 key votes in the 2009-2014 European Parliament: main insights
On the basis of a common effort undertaken by think-tanks across the EU, this Synthesis by Valentin Kreilinger highlights the main findings of the research undertaken in 20 countries to analyse 15 key votes in the 2009-2014 European Parliament.
On the basis of a common effort undertaken by think-tanks across the EU, this Synthesis by Valentin Kreilinger highlights the main findings of the research undertaken in 20 countries to analyse 15 key votes in the 2009-2014 European Parliament.
The Synthesis is divided into five chapters:
– The first chapter explains the purpose of the project and the different legislative acts and procedures in the European Union.
– The second chapter briefly describes why the 2014 European Parliament elections matter and what data and analyses allow showing its activities during the last term.
– After that the third chapter looks which of the key votes mattered at the national level and to which extent. Economic governance issues have not been the most salient issues. The non-binding resolution on Eurobonds, for instance, was perceived differently in Germany or Finland and in Italy. ACTA and the Multiannual financial framework were the most prominent votes, despite being both (only) under the consent procedure.
– The fourth chapter examines what happens when MEPs are torn between their European political group and their country. Here the case of the Financial transactions tax is particularly enlightening. Actually the national parties within the European political groups play the decisive role, because they control the re-election prospects of “their” MEPs. The in-depth analyses for some countries show that there are national parties which have chosen the “wrong” political group in the European Parliament.
– Finally the fifth chapter concludes that there are co-existing conflict lines in the European Parliament: left vs. right and pro-EU vs. anti-EU. Sometimes nationality trumps European-ness, sometimes the reasons are also difficult to distinguish. But an analysis of key votes can help to understand how MEPs voted and what they stood and stand for.
A presentation of the project “European Parliament votes that shaped EU and national politics 2009-2014” initiated by Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute and VoteWatch Europe and national reports are available here.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
What’s happening in the European Parliament?

Lessons learned from the implementation of crisis response tools at EU level

Commonalities and fault lines in EU economic policy visions

Political dynamics ahead of the European Parliament elections: implications for the EU’s political direction and policy priorities

Would a shift to the right in the elections lead to a change in the central coalition in the European Parliament?

A European Parliament keen to strengthen its role on the international stage

A European Parliament keen to strengthen its role on the international stage

Why the European Parliament matters?

European elections 2024: guidelines

Who are our Members of the European Parliament? 1/4

The true power of the EU is in transforming countries and lives

Towards transnational lists in 2024?

Tribute to David Sassoli, a driving force in Europe’s social conscience

History of a breakdown:Fidesz’s departure from the EPP group at the European Parliament

Climate: How do MEPs vote?

CRISIS NOTEBOOK

Will Brexit turn the European Parliament upside-down ?

Discours du président Sassoli à l’Institut Jacques Delors

The European Parliament, Another Parliament

Un Parlement ne peut pas en cacher un autre

What impact would a No Deal Brexit have on European Parliament elections?

EU’s multi-level system: Strengthening parliamentary voices

Transnational Lists: a Political Opportunity for Europe with Obstacles to Overcome

Rights and Role of the European Parliament in Common Commercial Policy

Faces on divides: mid-term Czech MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term Greek MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term French MEPs’ votes

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes – South-West euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes – Overseas territories euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes – West euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes in the East euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes – South-East euroconstitutency

Faces on divides : MEPs votes Mid-term assessment

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes in the “Massif Central – Centre” euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes in the “Ile-de-France” euroconstituency

Mid-term French MEPs’ votes in the North West euroconstituency

2014 European elections: an upsurge in Europhobia or business as usual?

European political parties: learning from 2014, preparing for 2019

Euroscepticism or Europhobia: voice vs. exit?

What political and institutional evolutions for the EU and the EMU?

European Parliament votes that shaped EU and national politics 2009-2014

The EU and its legislation: prison of peoples or chicken coops?

Europe: union is an opportunity and a struggle!

European elections: the abstention trap

Faces on divides: the May 2014 European elections

Europe: an ode to fear?

The impact of the populist parties in the next European Parliament

European Commission and Parliament: what relations?

How to communicate ahead of the European elections?

What political balance of power in the next European Parliament?

European Elections : less abstention, more populism?

Strengthening Europe’s position in the world

Beyond the Troika: which divides and faces for the EU?

The EU: looking for symbols

The media and the EU: “foreign affairs”?

The democratic and parliamentary control of the European Council and Eurozone summits

“Democracy in Europe”

Europe’s Parliament: People, Places, Politics

Post-national democracy and the reform of the European Parliament

What is the impact of the EU interventions at the national level?

European elections: Five reflections for discussion

Democracy in the EU and the Role of the European Parliament

Politicising the European debate

1999: Year 1 of European parliamentarism?

Politisation of the Union: the case of the Services Directive

Reductionist approach

Politicising the Union ? Indeed, but how ?

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Le Parlement européen valide la Commission von der Leyen II

Une majorité d’eurodéputés retiennent du rapport d’Enrico Letta le besoin de réduire la bureaucratie

Comment Stéphane Séjourné se prépare à passer sur le gril du Parlement européen
