Report
European budget : the poisonous budget rebate debate
“Net balance” calculations have become a central issue in the affairs of the European Union. The author of this study reveals just how fragile, volatire and even meaningless the figures can be.
FOREWORD BY PASCAL LAMY.
The financial negotiations that have just ended in stalemate over the forthcoming European medium-term perspectives for the period 2007-2013 have revealed how important “net national budgetary balances” have become in determining member states’ negotiating stances on issues such as, for example, the British cheque. In the Netherlands, opponents of the Constitutional Treaty successfully brandished the spectre of the country’s excessively large “net contribution payment”, Sweden, Spain and even Finland have also been struck by this contagious disease, judging from the recent stiffening of their negotiating positions. And that without referring to the case of several new member states whose eyes are riveted to these figures. “Net balance” calculations have thus become a central issue in the affairs of the European Union. Yet on closer inspection the figures suffer from crippling deficiencies, which should rule out their use except in marginal cases and even then only it they are handled with the greatest care.
Such is the message conveyed by this study, which Notre Europe commissioned from Jacques Le Cacheux, the eminent specialist in European Community public finances. The author’s close examination of the underlying budgetary, economic and political basis of net balance calculations reveals just how fragile, volatile and even meaningless the figures can be. As readers, we cannot fail to share the author’s doubts after his exposition. But why has the unjustified use of these figures spread to the extent that they now systematically undermine discussions and negotiations which should be focusing instead on the medium-term funding allocations to Community policies and the fairest way of contributing financially to them? The answer to this question lies in the enduring fortunes of an idea that is as appealing as it is erroneous: the concept of a “fair return”. It purports to show that European construction is a zero sum game in which monies “paid” or “received” by member countries should balance each other out when weighed on the Budget scales. With this new study by Jacques Le Cacheux, Notre Europe has, I hope, taken another step towards fulfilling its mission of promoting continued European integration on intellectually solid ground, putting setbacks and crises behind it and rejecting the easy options of illusions and mystification. Thanks to this work we now know that net balances belong to the realm of illusion!
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Adapting the EU budget to make it fit for the purpose of future enlargements

EU enlargement and the post-2027 Multi-Annual Financial Framework

How stringent would the new Stability and Growth Pact be? And for who?

The tools for protecting the EU budget from breaches of the rule of law

Macro-economic impact of the EU Recovery Funds

THE NEXT REVISION OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION AND THE EU BUDGET GALAXY

From words to action

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

Coronavirus krach financier et krach politique

The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?

MFF negotiations: towards the end?

‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?

Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme

Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?

InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?

Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget

Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution

The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility

EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?

Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”

The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding

The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?

Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?

The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?

Public Sector Reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it

Is there an alternative to the European economic policy? The European Parliament response

Federalising the Eurozone: Towards a true European budget?

What would a European finance minister do? A proposal

A new road map for the EU

The adjustements to the EU budget

National budgets and European surveillance: Shedding light on the debate

Reforming Europe’s governance

Adjustment programmes in the euro area: mission accomplished?

Who calls the shots in the euro area? “Brussels” or the member states?

Non-Community European spending

EU budget: the path to an agreement

The role and place of Parliaments in a genuine Economic and Monetary Union

EU and growth: three pacts rather than one

European budget 2014-2020: seven years of bad luck?

Is the stupidity pact still stable?

How to maintain hard capabilities in times of budget cuts?

The EU budget: taking a second look

Britain and Europe – The last rites?

Spending better together: analyses and recommendations

Reforming the EU budget in times of crisis

Eurozone budget: 3 functions, 3 instruments

“Fiscal Compact”, sovereignty and austerity

Which Institutions for the Euro Area?

What European budget for post-crisis Europe?

European Development Aid: How to be more effective without spending more?

European guarantees to get out of the crisis?

The European “Fiscal Compact”: a goal or a starting point?

EU budget negotiations: need for a healthy and constructive debate

The “Fiscal Compact”: legal uncertainty and political ambiguity

The ‘TSCG’: much ado about nothing?

A two-pronged defence of the Euro

The Common Strategic Framework: adding value to rural development?

Debt crisis, sovereignty crisis

The CAP in the EU Budget: New Objectives and Financial Principles for the Agricultural Budget after 2013

Rethinking EU finances in times of crisis

Thinking the EU budget and public spending in Europe: the need to use an aggregate approach

Defence spending in Europe: Can we do better without spending more?

The “added value” in EU budgetary debates: one concept, four meanings

Report Haug, Lamassoure, Verhofstadt: Europe for Growth : Towards a radical change in financing the EU

Options for an EU Financing Reform

Comments on the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments on the policy paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the policy paper “A New Budget for the European Union?” by A. Iozzo, S. Micossi and MT. Salvemini

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Réaction à la note publiée par le CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

EU Budget Review: Addressing the Thorny Issues

The case for a European tax: Benefits, practical aspects and options for endowing the EU with a veritable own resource

The EU budget: What for?

Funding the EU Budget with a Genuine Own Resource: The case for a European Tax

Budgetary discipline and macroeconomic policy in the European Union

Reform of EU policies in the perspective of enlargement and their financial implications

The Lisbon strategy and the open method of co-ordination: 12 recommendations for an effective multi-level strategy

Rule of law conditionality

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
FRANCE : L’UNION DES INDUSTRIES UTILISATRICES D’ÉNERGIE (UNIDEN) APPELLE AU RATIONNEMENT

Peut-on parvenir à une souveraineté économique européenne?

Le nouveau «plan de résilience» teste la solidarité européenne
