Brief
European unemployment insurance: what citizens really think
The European Commission has argued repeatedly that the European Monetary Union (EMU) has to be completed by automatic fiscal stabilisers. Welfare states have built-in automatic stabilisers that cushion economic shocks; for instance, unemployment benefits support the purchasing power of people who lose their job.
The argument with regard to EMU is that a monetary union needs mechanisms to buttress or complement the automatic stabilizers of its member states. To achieve this, one of the options would be the re-insurance of national unemployment benefit schemes at the Eurozone level. Another option would be a scheme that supports Member States’ public investment capacity when they are hit by a crisis. Risk sharing can indeed be organized in many different ways and a large variety of concrete schemes has been proposed. Their advantages and disadvantages are debated.
However, a crucial question remains unresolved: are EU citizens ready to share the risk of unemployment crises? To shed light on that question, Frank Vandenbroucke, Brian Burgoon, Theresa Kuhn, Francesco Nicoli, Stefano Sacchi, David van der Duin and Sven Hegewald conducted a survey in 13 Member States, including France. Their survey takes that large diversity as much as possible into account and translates it to citizens of all straits of the population in an understandable way. The core idea in all the policy variants they tested is that a new European policy would support unemployment benefits in countries that are in need, due to a significant increase in unemployment. Therefore, they refer to their core idea as ‘European Unemployment Risk Sharing’ (EURS). Their results show that the specific design of policies, aiming at particular modes of risk sharing, matters for public support among citizens. The most important conclusion is that fundamental opposition to EURS is confined to a relatively small segment of the population. Rather than insurmountable polarization, they observe room for constructive democratic deliberation.
This brief written by Frank Vandenbroucke and Francesco Nicoli is based on the report: Frank Vandenbroucke, Brian Burgoon, Theresa Kuhn, Francesco Nicoli, Stefano Sacchi, David van der Duin, Sven Hegewald, Risk Sharing When Unemployment Hits: How Policy Design Influences Citizen Support For European Unemployment Risk Sharing (EURS). 2018. AISSR Policy Report 1, December
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
2025: Reviving Jacques Delors’ Social Ambition

Social Priorities under the von der Leyen II Commission

Social Europe: social dialogue at the heart of the debate

Making the most of the European Year of Skills

Pension systems in Europe

Parents’ leaves in the EU

Welcoming Ukrainian refugees in the EU

All hands on deck for more gender equality in corporate decision-making

A move towards adequate minimum wages in the European Union?

IS IT TIME FOR A EUROPEAN UNEMPLOYMENT (RE)INSURANCE?

CONTINUING EDUCATION, ACCORDING TO JACQUES DELORS, THE CATALYST OF A CHANGING SOCIETY

The Porto Social Summit: turning principles into actions

Towards a European individual learning account

How to close the gender pay gap in the European Union ?

Towards an individual right to adult learning for all europeans

A move towards adequate minimum wages in the European Union?

SURE or the EU to aid European workers

Achieving a european minimum wage? Clarifications on the issue

The reform of the EMU: what social dimension?

Towards a European Transition Support Fund

Social Europe: From Slogan to Reality

What is our Ambition for the European Labour Authority?
