Report
Funding the EU Budget with a Genuine Own Resource: The case for a European Tax
This study aims to contribute to the current debate on the creation of a genuine EU own resource. The purpose is not to add new proposals to those already put forward by the Commission or by other scholars, but to clarify the economic and political criteria that will have to be brought to bear on the choice of an adequate tax instrument for the European Union. On the basis of these criteria, the various EU tax candidates are assessed and a rough estimate of their respective potential receipts is eported.The study also discusses the political and technical difficulties facing the introduction of an EU tax and explores the possible avenues for implementing the most promising EU tax proposals.
Abstract
Amounting to approximately bn. 120 ‚¬ in 2007, i.e. a little more than 1% of European GDP, the EU budget is almost exclusively funded by national contributions based on GNI. In preparation for the mid-term review called for by both the EU Council of December 2005 and the EU Parliament, this paper offers a broad reflection on possible instruments for funding the EU budget with genuine own resources, specifically on the possible EU tax instruments. It first briefly recalls the history of the EU budget and a number of important flaws and drawbacks in the decision-making procedures over the medium term financial framework that currently defines the path of expenditures for seven years. In the second section, we review the major criteria to be considered when choosing amongst various financing instruments; some such criteria are of general application in any democratic public finance context, others are more specific to decentralized or federal contexts. Major candidates for an EU tax are then analyzed in more detail, and assessed according these various criteria: first, the most frequently quoted ones, a European VAT or an excise duty or eco-tax; then the corporate income tax, also an obvious candidate in a single market; finally a number of other tax instruments sometimes mentioned here or there. A very rough estimation of the potential yield of each of these instruments is then attempted, based on existing aggregate data, in order to provide orders of magnitude. Section 5 is dedicated to discussing some practical difficulties related to the implementation of a European tax. We then conclude that an eco-tax or a corporate income tax would seem to fare quite well with regard to the majority of criteria discussed, but that none appears to dominate on all grounds, so that the choice would have to weigh pros and cons.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
From words to action

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?

MFF negotiations: towards the end?

‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

Innovation for the energy & climate transition

European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?

Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme

Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?

InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?

Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget

Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution

The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility

EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?

Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”

The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding

The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?

Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?

The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?

Making the Energy Transition a European Success

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?

Public Sector Reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it

Investment in Europe: Making the best of the Juncker Plan

Is there an alternative to the European economic policy? The European Parliament response

Federalising the Eurozone: Towards a true European budget?

What would a European finance minister do? A proposal

A new road map for the EU

The adjustements to the EU budget

National budgets and European surveillance: Shedding light on the debate

Reforming Europe’s governance

Adjustment programmes in the euro area: mission accomplished?

Who calls the shots in the euro area? “Brussels” or the member states?

Non-Community European spending

EU budget: the path to an agreement

The role and place of Parliaments in a genuine Economic and Monetary Union

EU and growth: three pacts rather than one

European budget 2014-2020: seven years of bad luck?

Is the stupidity pact still stable?

How to maintain hard capabilities in times of budget cuts?

The EU budget: taking a second look

Britain and Europe – The last rites?

Spending better together: analyses and recommendations

Reforming the EU budget in times of crisis

Eurozone budget: 3 functions, 3 instruments

Which Institutions for the Euro Area?

“Fiscal Compact”, sovereignty and austerity

What European budget for post-crisis Europe?

European Development Aid: How to be more effective without spending more?

European guarantees to get out of the crisis?

The European “Fiscal Compact”: a goal or a starting point?

EU budget negotiations: need for a healthy and constructive debate

The “Fiscal Compact”: legal uncertainty and political ambiguity

The ‘TSCG’: much ado about nothing?

A two-pronged defence of the Euro

The Common Strategic Framework: adding value to rural development?

Debt crisis, sovereignty crisis

The CAP in the EU Budget: New Objectives and Financial Principles for the Agricultural Budget after 2013

Rethinking EU finances in times of crisis

Thinking the EU budget and public spending in Europe: the need to use an aggregate approach

Defence spending in Europe: Can we do better without spending more?

The “added value” in EU budgetary debates: one concept, four meanings

Report Haug, Lamassoure, Verhofstadt: Europe for Growth : Towards a radical change in financing the EU

Options for an EU Financing Reform

Comments on the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments on the policy paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the policy paper “A New Budget for the European Union?” by A. Iozzo, S. Micossi and MT. Salvemini

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Réaction à la note publiée par le CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

EU Budget Review: Addressing the Thorny Issues

The case for a European tax: Benefits, practical aspects and options for endowing the EU with a veritable own resource

The EU budget: What for?

Budgetary discipline and macroeconomic policy in the European Union

Reform of EU policies in the perspective of enlargement and their financial implications

European budget : the poisonous budget rebate debate

The Lisbon strategy and the open method of co-ordination: 12 recommendations for an effective multi-level strategy

Rule of law conditionality

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Peut-on parvenir à une souveraineté économique européenne?

FRANCE : L’UNION DES INDUSTRIES UTILISATRICES D’ÉNERGIE (UNIDEN) APPELLE AU RATIONNEMENT

Le nouveau «plan de résilience» teste la solidarité européenne
