Brief
InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?
Almost four years ago, EU leaders endorsed the idea of the then recently appointed president of the Commission Jean-Claude Juncker to launch an “Investment Plan for Europe”. The main element of this Plan was the creation of a new type of instrument, the “European Fund for Strategic Investments” (EFSI), popularly known as the “Juncker Fund”. In June 2018, the Commission released its proposal of a “InvestEU Fund”, the EU’s investment instrument which will replace the “Juncker Fund” after 2020. According to the Commission, the new Fund builds on the experience of the EFSI but how similar is it to it? Is it just a rebranding operation or are we in front of a different instrument?
This paper, by Eulalia Rubio, senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute, and Fleurilys Virel, research assistant at the Jacques Delors Institute, describes the main features of the InvestEU Fund, analyses what it changes with respect to the “Juncker fund” (EFSI) and provides a first assessment of the Commission’s legislative proposal.
Overall, they find that:
- There is a move from a system composed of 15 EU Financial Instruments and one EU guarantee (EFSI) to a single EU investment support scheme (InvestEU Fund). This is positive, as it will allow for more flexibility and will eliminate duplicities between EU instruments identified in EFSI evaluations.
- Various aspects of the InvestEUFund (a lower investment target, more policy steering) reflect the willingness to shift from a focus on quantity (mobilizing a major volume of private investment) to quality (crowding in private investment in specific sectors suffering from persistent market gaps). This is a coherent move given the improvement of investment conditions in Europe.
- The implementation of InvestEU Fund will not be exclusively entrusted to the EIB group (as it is the case for the Juncker Fund) but offered to a plurality of eligible implementing partners. While this is a transformational decision, it may entail little changes in practice given the strict conditions and limits imposed to new actors and the fact that the European Investment Bank (EIB) remains the “privileged partner”.
- Whereas the “Juncker Fund” is organized in two windows, InvestEU Fund has four thematic “policy windows” (sustainable infrastructure research; innovation and digitisation; SMEs and mid-caps; and social investment and skills). Whereas a more detailed breakdown allows better targeting policy-specific investment needs, the proposed allocation of resources is not well-justified in the proposal. As it currently stands, the new InvestEUFund will cover almost half of the existing investment gap in SMEs and mid-caps in Europe but only 10% of the gap in sustainable infrastructures.
- The new Fund offers more incentives to transfer part of member states’ cohesion funds to the EU level. In particular, under InvestEUFund national authorities can appoint their own National Promotional Bank to set-up and implement financial instruments covered by the EU guarantee.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
From words to action

TOWARDS A EUROPEAN HEALTH UNION

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

The EU ETS: from cornerstone to catalyst

A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?

MFF negotiations: towards the end?

‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

Innovation for the energy & climate transition

European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?

Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme

The Challenges of Chinese Investment Control in Europe

Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?

Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget

The MFF proposal: what’s new, what’s old, what’s next?

Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution

The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility

EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?

Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”

The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding

The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?

Social Investment and Juncker Plan

Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?

The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?

Making the Energy Transition a European Success

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?

Public Sector Reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it

Managing a successful UK-EU divorce, arousing the desire for Union

Investment in Europe: Making the best of the Juncker Plan

Is there an alternative to the European economic policy? The European Parliament response

Federalising the Eurozone: Towards a true European budget?

What would a European finance minister do? A proposal

On asylum and the euro: displaying solidarity is in our own interest

A new road map for the EU

The adjustements to the EU budget

National budgets and European surveillance: Shedding light on the debate

Reforming Europe’s governance

Adjustment programmes in the euro area: mission accomplished?

Who calls the shots in the euro area? “Brussels” or the member states?

Non-Community European spending

EU budget: the path to an agreement

The role and place of Parliaments in a genuine Economic and Monetary Union

EU and growth: three pacts rather than one

European budget 2014-2020: seven years of bad luck?

Is the stupidity pact still stable?

How to maintain hard capabilities in times of budget cuts?

The EU budget: taking a second look

Britain and Europe – The last rites?

Spending better together: analyses and recommendations

Reforming the EU budget in times of crisis

Eurozone budget: 3 functions, 3 instruments

Which Institutions for the Euro Area?

“Fiscal Compact”, sovereignty and austerity

What European budget for post-crisis Europe?

European Development Aid: How to be more effective without spending more?

“The Spanish situation leads us to the banking union”

European guarantees to get out of the crisis?

EU budget negotiations: need for a healthy and constructive debate

The European “Fiscal Compact”: a goal or a starting point?

The “Fiscal Compact”: legal uncertainty and political ambiguity

The ‘TSCG’: much ado about nothing?

A two-pronged defence of the Euro

The Common Strategic Framework: adding value to rural development?

Debt crisis, sovereignty crisis

The CAP in the EU Budget: New Objectives and Financial Principles for the Agricultural Budget after 2013

Rethinking EU finances in times of crisis

Thinking the EU budget and public spending in Europe: the need to use an aggregate approach

Defence spending in Europe: Can we do better without spending more?

The “added value” in EU budgetary debates: one concept, four meanings

Report Haug, Lamassoure, Verhofstadt: Europe for Growth : Towards a radical change in financing the EU

Options for an EU Financing Reform

Comments on the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments on the policy paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the policy paper “A New Budget for the European Union?” by A. Iozzo, S. Micossi and MT. Salvemini

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the CEPS policy brief “A new Budget for the European Union?”

Réaction à la note publiée par le CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

Comments to the paper published by CEPS “A New Budget for the European Union?”

EU Budget Review: Addressing the Thorny Issues

The case for a European tax: Benefits, practical aspects and options for endowing the EU with a veritable own resource

The EU budget: What for?

Funding the EU Budget with a Genuine Own Resource: The case for a European Tax

Budgetary discipline and macroeconomic policy in the European Union

Reform of EU policies in the perspective of enlargement and their financial implications

European budget : the poisonous budget rebate debate

The Lisbon strategy and the open method of co-ordination: 12 recommendations for an effective multi-level strategy

Rule of law conditionality

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Peut-on parvenir à une souveraineté économique européenne?

FRANCE : L’UNION DES INDUSTRIES UTILISATRICES D’ÉNERGIE (UNIDEN) APPELLE AU RATIONNEMENT

Le nouveau «plan de résilience» teste la solidarité européenne
