Policy paper 267
European Union governance in response to crises
What are the conditions for effective and legitimate European political leadership?
Abstract ▪
1 ▪ Lessons learned from a decade of “sovereignty crises”
After more than ten years of crises, the EU’s current operating structure gives primacy to the European Council. This predominance of national governments and of the diplomatic approach has ambivalent repercussions. It raises a twofold issue of efficacy (leading to complex and slow negotiations, causing uncertainty and preventing the EU from speaking with one voice) and of legitimacy (as the political legitimacy of members within the European Council is conferred on a national level, and not on a European scale).
2 ▪ The EU faces the challenge of embodying its capacity for action and decision-making
Admittedly, progress has been made during the COVID-19 crisis regarding the EU’s ability to make key decisions, in particular with the decision to issue a common debt to finance the response to the pandemic and economic recovery. However, the health crisis has underscored structural weaknesses in the EU’s crisis management capacity –in terms of forward-thinking, preparation and decision-making– but also in the actual implementation of the solidarity principle, which must be strengthened and put into greater effect ahead of future crises. European political leadership must absolutely be clarified in terms of the rivalry between institutions and Member States.
3 ▪ What can be done? Under which conditions can a European decision-making capacity and political leadership be achieved?
Resolving the EU’s “executive deficit” must entail the fostering of clearer, more legitimate and more responsible political leadership. In the short term, this would involve in particular putting a face on the response to the health crisis –for example by drawing inspiration from the “Barnier method” which highlighted a highly effective coordination between political objectives, technical implementation, the implications for the EU institutions, along with a clear leadership. In the medium to long term, three avenues emerge as key if a more legitimate, more responsible and therefore more efficient political leadership is to be developed: strengthen the “Spitzenkandidaten” system to elect the President of the Commission, reform the electoral system at the European Parliament by creating transnational lists that are likely to contribute towards bolstering the legitimacy of the choice made by EU leaders and subsequently their effectiveness. Lastly, the legitimacy and efficacy of the EU could be usefully reinforced by implementing a contract of mandate between the European Parliament, the Commission and the Council.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Beyond Robert Schuman’s Europe – citizen’s ideas and historic perspective for a better Union

European values. A debate to be clarified, a struggle to be fought

A Europe for today and tomorrow

Europe, a partner to anti-COVID vaccination in Africa

From words to action

TOWARDS A EUROPEAN HEALTH UNION

EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION IN A TROUBLED 2020

How does the Conference on the Future of Europe work?

How the Conference on the future of europe works

Young people facing the crisis: bouncing back with the EU

COVAX: Europe put to the test of global vaccine solidarity

History of a breakdown:Fidesz’s departure from the EPP group at the European Parliament

Balancing urgency with control

What is left of the “Visegrád Group”?

Spending EU subsidies well:
A challenge for Member States

A European vaccine passport? A healthy debate

Europeans facing vaccine hesitancy

A new European Health Agency ? For what ?

Greening EU Trade 4:
How to “green” trade agreements?

Framing the state aid debate for the post-covid era the Brexit challenge

Abolition of the death penalty: a european exception to be promoted

SURE or the EU to aid European workers

Building a clean mobility system in times of COVID-19

The new political economy of Brexit

Trade in pandemic times

Crisis Notebook

Jacques Delors Institute supports letters to EC Vice Presidents

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

CRISIS NOTEBOOK

CARNETS DE CRISE

Le covid-19 remet-il en cause l’Europe de la défense ?

Greener after

Judges vs. technocrats

The race for a Covid-19 vaccine :
A major challenge for Europe

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19: the urgent need for stricter foreign investment controls

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

COVID-19 Crisis: An Occasion to Accelerate the Transition Towards a new Development Model ?

SURE : A welcome LYNCHPIN for A European unemployment re-insurance

The EU facing the coronavirus:
A political urgency to embody European solidarity

Overcoming covid-19 crises
by building a clean and resilient Europe

The health crisis should not eclipse the migration crisis

Solidarity within the Eurozone :
how much, what for, for how long ?

Health: a highly perfectible added value for the EU

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

“We need a global alliance
against the virus”

Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

Representation and participation

Le choix des gouvernants de l’Union,
pour un équilibre entre démocratie et diplocratie

Europeans face the risk of democratic regression: what can be done

Appartenance assumée, adhésion réservée : évolution des opinions publiques sur l’Union européenne – de la crise à nos jours

“Illiberal Democracy” or “Majoritarian Authoritarianism”? Contribution to the analysis of populisms in Europe

Le troisième acte de l’histoire européenne

The revenge of the nation: political passions in contemporary Poland

EU’s multi-level system: Strengthening parliamentary voices

Invigorating European Democracy

Towards a more democratic European Union

The Rule of Law under Threat: What Can Europe Do?

Ireland on the rocky road to Brexit

Democratic Crises in the EU: Towards “New Frontiers”

United in diversity: Anthems and flags of the European Union

Faces on Divides: Citizen Debates in Le Mans and Toulouse

German Election: Last Vote to Make Europe

Europe, Germany, France: Evolution of Public Opinions

European public opinion and the EU following the peak of the migration crisis

European Democracy: What Are the Next Challenges

Enrico Letta about the main issues of the June 2017 EU Council

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

French and Europeans: Stronger Together!

Defending Europe to Defend Real Sovereignty

Social Networks and Populism in the EU : Comparative Study

National Referendums on EU Issues: from Clarification to Frustration

The Awakening

Living Together Facing Fears: the French Political Dilemma

Faces on divides: mid-term Czech MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term Greek MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term French MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides : MEPs votes Mid-term assessment

Europe in search of Europeans: The road of identity and myth

Yes, we are European!

For an ambitious Europe

Building the future of the EU: our generation’s duty

The Political Future of the European Union

The Political Future of the European Union by Manuel Valls

The Political Future of the European Union by Jean-Claude Juncker

Brexit: between British Europhobia and continental Euroscepticisms

Stronger together – even at 27!

Enrico Letta answered your questions on the state of the European Union

Joschka Fischer – “Europe after the British referendum”

“Brexit”: a British drama, a challenge for the EU

Managing a successful UK-EU divorce, arousing the desire for Union

The EU and referenda: three denials of democracy

The EU, despite everything? European public opinion in the face of crisis (2005–2015)

Pope Francis and the EU: give sense to the European project again?

Europe must rise to the challenges

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Halo (Tallinn)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Julia (Stockholm)

What do citizens think the future challenges of the EU are?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Neli (Sofia)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Kyrone (Valletta)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Richard (Amsterdam)

How would citizens like to communicate with the European Union?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Giuliana (Bucharest)

How does the European Union communicate with citizens?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Andreas (Athens)

How do citizens see the European Union?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Paul (Dublin)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Eileen (London)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Stefano (Milan)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Michel (Lille)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Lucía (Madrid)

What language(s) for the European Union?

European citizens in Brussels: what messages?

Citizens facing “Brussels’ Europe”

The involvement of EU citizens in the European project

Rural life in the 21st century, a beacon of hope for Europe

What political lessons should we learn from the Troika experience?

Redesigning the European project to improve employment and democracy?

What role should outermost regions in the European Union have?
