Policy paper 275
European values. A debate to be clarified, a struggle to be fought
Citer cet article:
Chopin T. & Macek L. 2022. “European values. A debate to be clarified, a struggle to be fought”, Policy paper, Paris: Jacques Delors Institute, 6 April.
Introduction
For several years now, liberal democracy has been challenged in Europe and elsewhere, in particular under pressure from national-populist and extremist political forces. Opinion polls demonstrate a growing public dissatisfaction with how democracy operates: endangered democratic freedoms, “illiberal democracy”, a risk of democratic “deconsolidation” or “regression”, a “populist century”, etc. are just some expressions which aim to bear witness to these changes within liberal democracies.
Outside the European Union, against a backdrop of authoritarian, dictatorial and totalitarian regimes asserting themselves worldwide, particularly in China, the reversion to violence in Europe, with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, highlights the key role of the fight between liberal democracy and an authoritarian regime, which is in practice increasingly dictatorial, with fascistic characteristics and even rhetoric with totalitarian undertones. The tragedy of the war in Ukraine is a democratic opportunity, as it forces us to consider our most deeply-rooted values, the society model in which we wish to live and the price we are willing to pay to live in free and open societies.
Yet, as Jacques Delors commented: “The fight [for values] is not very clear as it sometimes gets dressed up as a conflict between modernists and those who look back towards the past”. In other words, the debate on the issue of “European values” is often marred by the confusion between legal and political aspects on the one hand, and cultural and societal on the other. This confusion leads to adverse effects and undermines the reach of any effort to combat those seeking to thwart the founding values of liberal democracy.
In view of this, the aim of this paper is specifically to make a modest attempt to clarify the terms of this thorny issue, which is a necessary step to heighten the efficacy of any strategy striving to defend the values of liberal democracy at the foundation of the European Union. The following sections aim to: define as clearly as possible the fundamental “political values” placed at the heart of the European political project (1.), to put into perspective challenges to these values in a bid to disprove the rhetoric that asserts the commonplace nature of illiberalism, without overstating the East-West divide on this issue (2.), to contribute to providing elements of methodology for a strategy aimed at the successful “cultural” fight over European political values (3.).
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
The legal case against Hungary’s anti-LGBTIQ+ law

“European values” under pressure from war in Ukraine

Praise for representative democracy

To what extent are European values universal?

[FR] Ukrainian refugees: the next step

Migration, asylum, mobility and integration in Europe: inseparable common values

European Union governance in response to crises

History of a breakdown:Fidesz’s departure from the EPP group at the European Parliament

What is left of the “Visegrád Group”?

Abolition of the death penalty: a european exception to be promoted

Teaching Europe in France

Penser l’Europe Unie avec Beethoven

Representation and participation

Le choix des gouvernants de l’Union,
pour un équilibre entre démocratie et diplocratie

Europeans face the risk of democratic regression: what can be done

Les mots de la campagne : Europe(s) ?

Appartenance assumée, adhésion réservée : évolution des opinions publiques sur l’Union européenne – de la crise à nos jours

“Illiberal Democracy” or “Majoritarian Authoritarianism”? Contribution to the analysis of populisms in Europe

Le troisième acte de l’histoire européenne

The revenge of the nation: political passions in contemporary Poland

EU’s multi-level system: Strengthening parliamentary voices

Invigorating European Democracy

Towards a more democratic European Union

The Rule of Law under Threat: What Can Europe Do?

Ireland on the rocky road to Brexit

Democratic Crises in the EU: Towards “New Frontiers”

United in diversity: Anthems and flags of the European Union

Faces on Divides: Citizen Debates in Le Mans and Toulouse

German Election: Last Vote to Make Europe

Europe, Germany, France: Evolution of Public Opinions

European public opinion and the EU following the peak of the migration crisis

European Democracy: What Are the Next Challenges

Enrico Letta about the main issues of the June 2017 EU Council

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

French and Europeans: Stronger Together!

Defending Europe to Defend Real Sovereignty

Social Networks and Populism in the EU : Comparative Study

National Referendums on EU Issues: from Clarification to Frustration

The Awakening

Living Together Facing Fears: the French Political Dilemma

Faces on divides: mid-term Czech MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term Greek MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term French MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides : MEPs votes Mid-term assessment

Europe in search of Europeans: The road of identity and myth

Yes, we are European!

For an ambitious Europe

Building the future of the EU: our generation’s duty

The Political Future of the European Union

The Political Future of the European Union by Manuel Valls

The Political Future of the European Union by Jean-Claude Juncker

Brexit: between British Europhobia and continental Euroscepticisms

Stronger together – even at 27!

Enrico Letta answered your questions on the state of the European Union

Joschka Fischer – “Europe after the British referendum”

“Brexit”: a British drama, a challenge for the EU

Managing a successful UK-EU divorce, arousing the desire for Union

The EU and referenda: three denials of democracy

The EU, despite everything? European public opinion in the face of crisis (2005–2015)

Pope Francis and the EU: give sense to the European project again?

Europe must rise to the challenges

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Julia (Stockholm)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Halo (Tallinn)

What do citizens think the future challenges of the EU are?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Kyrone (Valletta)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Neli (Sofia)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Richard (Amsterdam)

How would citizens like to communicate with the European Union?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Giuliana (Bucharest)

How does the European Union communicate with citizens?

How do citizens see the European Union?

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Andreas (Athens)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Paul (Dublin)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Eileen (London)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Stefano (Milan)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Michel (Lille)

How to communicate with the EU? The opinion of Lucía (Madrid)

The EU after the elections: what strategy for globalisation?

What language(s) for the European Union?

Citizens facing “Brussels’ Europe”

European citizens in Brussels: what messages?

The involvement of EU citizens in the European project

Rural life in the 21st century, a beacon of hope for Europe

What political lessons should we learn from the Troika experience?

Redesigning the European project to improve employment and democracy?

What role should outermost regions in the European Union have?

European Union, democracy and euro

What role for the EU concerning employment in globalisation?

European Union, employment and democracy

Inventing the European policies of tomorrow

EU, unemployment and globalisation

The democratic and parliamentary control of the European Council and Eurozone summits

European influence: the need for a paradigm shift

European democracy: circus or reality?

Démocratie, marché, gouvernance – Quels avenirs ? by Jacques Lesourne

Reaction of Paul Magnette to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
« Les idées follement agitées par Trump valorisent par contraste l’originalité de l’intégration européenne : unir le continent sans la force »

Hors-série – Démocratie à l’ère Trump

Face à la Russie, une Europe à 47 !
