Policy Paper 68
Potential and limits of EU policies in the neighbourhood
Michele Comelli, Senior Fellow, Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) —
Contrary to the premises on which it was launched back in 2003, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) has underperformed in many ways. While democratisation in Eastern Europe has lapsed, a number of Southern Mediterranean countries overthrew their ruling autocrats, but the EU had no role in that. The EU revised the ENP in 2011, but the revision looks unimpressive. In particular, conditionality appears unlikely to work in countries where reforms have been an endogenous product. New challenges have also emerged from the new economic and strategic context. Internally, the crisis has absorbed significant energy and resources, plus Member States tend not only to bypass common external policies, but possibly stand in the way of implementing Lisbon Treaty foreign policy provisions. Externally, other actors have emerged in the EU neighbourhood, while neighbouring countries and their citizens no longer necessarily look at the EU as a model and final foreign policy goal. The EU should adopt a political, not technocratic approach to its periphery, get Member States to support common policies, and seek ad hoc cooperation with new powers in the area, like Turkey. A strategic and proactive approach to the neighbourhood is needed, one that looks at the opportunities for the EU, and not just at the challenges and threats.
Contrary to the premises on which it was launched back
in 2003, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) has underperformed in many
ways. While democratisation in Eastern Europe has lapsed, a number of Southern
Mediterranean countries overthrew their ruling autocrats, but the EU had no
role in that. The EU revised the ENP in 2011, but the revision looks unimpressive.
In particular, conditionality appears unlikely to work in countries where
reforms have been an endogenous product. New challenges have also emerged from
the new economic and strategic context. Internally, the crisis has absorbed significant
energy and resources, plus Member States tend not only to bypass common
external policies, but possibly stand in the way of implementing Lisbon Treaty
foreign policy provisions. Externally, other actors have emerged in the EU
neighbourhood, while neighbouring countries and their citizens no longer
necessarily look at the EU as a model and final foreign policy goal. The EU
should adopt a political, not technocratic approach to its periphery, get
Member States to support common policies, and seek ad hoc cooperation
with new powers in the area, like Turkey. A strategic and proactive approach to
the neighbourhood is needed, one that looks at the opportunities for the EU,
and not just at the challenges and threats.
“How to make out of its neighbourhood an opportunity for the EU itself?” which
includes contributions by Haizam Amirah Fernández (Elcano Royal Institute) and Timo Behr (Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute), Christophe Hillion(SIEPS), Lucia Najšlová (Europeum), Vera Rihácková (Europeum), Olga Shumylo-Tapiola (Carnegie Europe), Adam Balcer (demosEuropa).
The project is led with the support of the
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Taking the European Neighbourhood Policy beyond the conception-performance gap

The European neighbourhood and the EU’s security of supply with natural gas

Neighbourhood policy: more or no more?

A catalyst role for the Union

The external challenges of the EU: what strategies?

The EU needs a fresh boost… Fast!

Resetting EU external action: potential and constraints

A new road map for the EU

A dual horizon: emerging from the crisis and addressing international challenges

Engaging Europe in the world

Put to the test: the Eastern Partnership and the EU

Think Global – Act European IV. Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

What borders for the EU: a variable geometry neighborhood?

“Europe” and its “enlargements”: enough… or do we want more?

Engaging with middle and global players

Think Global – Act European IV – Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

EU-Mediterranean relations in the field of agriculture. The example of Morocco and Turkey

The Missing Spring in the EU’s Mediterranean Policies

The EU neighbourhood competence under Article 8 TEU

The EU and Turkey in the Southern Neighbourhood: a new opening?

The EU in the East: too ambitious in rhetoric, too unfocused in action

Where does CSDP fit in EU foreign policy?

Desperately looking for more EU-Turkey geo-political and geo-economic cooperation

Welfare state sustainability: resetting EU migration strategy?

Promoting EU economic interests abroad

The EU’s neighbourhood as an opportunity?

Visas and Schengen Code: Towards a win-win cooperation between the EU and its neighbours?

EU governance under the stress test of emerging economies

Trade Policy in the EU’s Neighbourhood. Ways forward for the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements

After the Revolution: The EU and the Arab Transition

The EU, its Neighbours and its Borders

The EU and the Arab Spring: a vision for our neighbours

European Union’s response to the Arab Spring: Building a true pole of influence with all our neighbours

The EU and the world: sink or swim

Baltic Sea, Danube and macro-regional strategies: a model for transnational cooperation in the EU?

Regional Integration in the Mediterranean: Moving out of the Deadlock?

Kosovo after 10 December 2007: What’s at stake for the European Union

Trans-European Cooperation, a Template for the New Europe

Looking after the neighbourood: responsabilities for EU 25

EU-Russian Relations: Moscow lays down its Conditions

Boost the spirit of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Vers une entrée rapide de l’Ukraine dans l’UE ? “Un symbole fort mais peu réaliste”

Ukraine, l’Europe unie dans son soutien

Macron à Moscou et Kiev : “La crise ukrainienne est une occasion à ne pas rater pour la France”
