Policy paper 268
Putting the cart before the horse? PERSPECTIVES ON A POTENTIAL ETS ON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
The author wishes to thank Thomas Pellerin-Carlin, Phuc-Vinh Ngyuen, Marie Delair, Sébastien Maillard for their valuable comments.
Executive summary ▪
To tackle climate change and make the EU Green Deal a reality, European buildings need to slash emissions by 60% by 2030, and become climate neutral in the late 2040s. This can be done with already existing technologies and techniques. Key obstacles to buildings’ mass renovation are a lack of clear decarbonization strategy, weak regulatory framework, high upfront costs and access to finance.
To trigger a Renovation Wave, the European Commission will propose reforms strengthening existing EU buildings regulations in the upcoming “Fitfor55” energy and climate package. It also considers the introduction of a new instrument: an Emissions Trading System (ETS) on buildings to put an EU-wide carbon price on heating fuels. However, applying the polluter
-payer principle to buildings may raise more issues than it hopes to solve.
Most EU buildings are homes, and households would be hit hardest. Due to important non-market barriers, the carbon price would need to be very high (150 to 250€/tCO2) to bring on building renovation. This would have a stronger impact on lowest-income households. A price control mechanism would avoid high prices with too much equity impact. In this case, carbon price will not drive the decarbonization of the housing stock, but simply act as a complementary tool. Fostering social acceptability will require to use 100% of the revenues for social compensation and green investments in renovation. However, policy solutions will never mitigate the full impact of the carbon price. Splitting the burden is a political choice which should be subject to a transparent and inclusive debate.
To finance a socially-fair energy transition in buildings, there are alternative financing sources, including revenues from strengthening the current ETS. To rebalance heating fuel taxation between those already covered by the ETS (electricity and district heating) and the others (e.g. gas), then a reform of the Energy Taxation Directive could play a similar role while ensuring better price predictability. Finally, an EU-wide carbon price is not necessary for the buildings sector given the lack of cross-border issues: no household would move to another EU Member State to benefit from cheaper heating prices. In any case, social justice and consistency should guide carbon taxation. Removing fossil fuel subsidies also contributes to establish a level playing field with low carbon options.
Establishing a new ETS on buildings is a high risk and low reward policy. It would require considerable administrative and political work, diverting efforts from more impactful decarbonization tools. Given distributional impacts of the carbon price and market failures, instruments such as subsidies and performance standards may be more effective in steering rapid and socially-fair transition of buildings. Lastly, the EU would take a major political risk in introducing an EU measure whose success will eventually rests on national policies’ fairness and Member States’ effective implementation of ambitious renovation policies that are currently lacking. There is a risk to have the poorest paying the highest price of the energy transition. No need to rush for an EU-wide carbon price on buildings. There is a lack consultation at the EU level (not to say national and local) on a potentially highly socially regressive policy that requires extensive stakeholders’ engagement.
This policy paper recommends that:
- The EU Commission, EU Parliament and Council of the EU should put regulatory and supporting policies first by establishing :
– An ambitious regulatory framework aligned with climate neutrality, with gradually increasing standards for buildings envelopes and heating systems
– An EU Renovation Fund fueled by additional revenues from the current ETS, investing in the deep renovation of buildings to the benefit of energy poor families. This could be the core of the ‘Climate Action Social Facility’ considered by the European Commission. - The EU Commission and/or the EU Parliament should open an EU-wide multi-level public debate on carbon price on heating and burden sharing of transition costs, which could on the agenda of the Conference for the Future of the European Union. Besides, an EU Citizen Assembly on Climate could feed-in the debate on whether an ETS on heating fuels should be implemented or not, and if yes, under which design and alongside which policies.
- If the EU Parliament and the Council of the EU choose to adopt the ETS on buildings the EU Commission will propose, they should ensure that a price control mechanism keeps allowances prices at very low levels at least until the worst-performing buildings occupied by low-income households are renovated and key investment barriers removed. 100% of those newly generated revenues should be used for climate and social action, first to compensate the most affected, and second to fund deep renovation of buildings inhabited by energy poor Europeans. Special attention should be given to consistency of the energy reforms to foster social acceptability.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
The multiple benefits of energy efficiency

THE RESURGENCE OF US INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND EUROPE’S RESPONSE

Gas supply security in Europe

A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework in Sun4All pilot cities

[FR] The Green Deal for Europe: towards climate neutrality

The EU Green Deal in a volatile world

Overview of the European electricity market

Make the Social Climate Fund a game changer to tackle energy poverty

The Swedish energy transition.
A race far from won

[FR] France’s energy future

Declining birth rate in Europe

Can a minimum price on carbon accelerate the adoption of clean technologies?

Newsletter June 2022

The need for a socially-just European Green Deal

[FR] Spitzenkandidaten : oui ou non ?

United in diversity? National responses to the European energy crisis

Regional perspectives on energy citizenship and citizen participation in the energy transition

Energy Sufficiency

Stop feeding the bear

What do we mean when we talk about energy citizenship?

[EN] Setting the scene for a critical exploration of the roles of citizens in the European energy transition

European Dependence on Russian Gas
–The Example of Nord Stream 2

Climate policy
of the new German Government

Belonging to Europe

No more free lunch. Ending free allowances in the EU ETS to the benefit of innovation

An inclusive Social Climate Fund for the just transition

Programme de travail 2022.
L’Europe à clarifier, approfondir et imaginer

A move towards adequate minimum wages in the European Union?

The European recovery plan as a breakthrough for green innovation? Challenges and opportunities for an innovative green recovery

Message for the JDI’s 25th anniversary celebration. Thinking Europe as ours

TOWARDS A EUROPEAN HEALTH UNION

CONTINUING EDUCATION, ACCORDING TO JACQUES DELORS, THE CATALYST OF A CHANGING SOCIETY

The German Energy transition

FRENCH-STYLE EUROSCEPTICISM

High energy prices. Russia fights back?

Addressing the climate and social emergencies with minimum energy performance standards

Cop 26: Europe leads the way towards climate neutrality

The European energy price spike

A Social Climate Fund for a fair energy transition

Climate: How do MEPs vote?

the French and the environment

The EU ETS: from cornerstone to catalyst

Make transatlantic cooperation great again

Let’s innovate to achieve climate neutrality

Make regulation fit for innovation

CHALLENGES FOR EUROPEAN RAIL

Europe needs to innovate
to become a front-runner in the global green economy race

Europe needs a political strategy to end energy poverty

How to lift 30 million Europeans out of Energy poverty?

5 years after the Paris Agreement, the largest global economies are engaging in the race towards climate neutrality

Making transatlantic relations green: a common agenda for climate action

Greening EU Trade 4:
How to “green” trade agreements?

European Green Transparency
Lessons from France and Further Room Improvement

Science and Innovation as the way out of the crisis

Europe continues its climate marathon

Joining forces to ensure a green and social recovery

Building a clean mobility system in times of COVID-19

Jacques Delors Institute supports letters to EC Vice Presidents

A European Border Carbon Adjustment proposal
Greening EU trade – 3

Greener after

L’Europe sans charbon

French public opinion and Europe
between distrust and ambivalence

Overcoming covid-19 crises
by building a clean and resilient Europe

Making the Green Deal a European success
Coalition, narrative, flagships

What business can do for the European Green Deal

What is the scope of the EU external Competence
in the field of energy today?

Russian gas pipelines and the EU: moving from a love-hate relationship “with adults in the room”?

Greening EU trade policy – 2 :
the economics of trade and environment

Élargissement :
Faire tomber le mur du rejet

Reflections on “the end of the cold war?”

30 ans après la chute du Mur de Berlin :
Penser les frontières de l’Union européenne

To help fight climate change, we support increasing the Horizon Europe research and innovation budget

Cities in Europe
What EU innovation can do for climate neutrality

The European Green deal starts with the energy transition

Time to green EU trade policy : but how?

Innovation for the energy & climate transition

A small electric car is 3 times cleaner than a small gasoline car

L’Europe de l’énergie existe : le citoyen l’a rencontrée

Climate Change: at the Heart of a New European Political Balance

Just energy transition: a reality test in Europe’s coal regions

Relever le défi énergétique et climatique en Europe : les propositions de 5 think tanks

Electric vehicles, european mobility and industrial leadership at stake

Clean Mobility: The European Way – A Comprehensive Approach to Electric Vehicles in the Energy Transition

2019, année pour « Nous, Européens »

Europe : la nécessité d’agir

From Trump to the European New Deal

The European ambition of President Macron and the reactions in Europe to his project

Europe: facing climate change

COP21: an opportunity to speed up the global energy transition

Sharing solidarity and sovereignty better: transcending “euroscoliosis”

2015 Climate negotiations: Speeding up or slowing down the energy transition?

Out of concern for Europe

Is Europe failing?

Reforming Europe’s governance

The reality of precaution: US-EU comparative analysis

Post-election EU: Ask for the programme!

Making more of our interdependence

Think Global – Act European IV. Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

Fear not, we will get there!

Europe between renewal and decline

Think Global – Act European IV – Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

Building Europe: V. Giscard d’Estaing and J. Delors debate with young Europeans

The Nobel Prize, then what?

What future for the EU and its Court of justice?

EU resource management: time for coherence

EU, Catalonia and regional separatism

A green path of growth for the European economy? Synthesis of Green Forum 2012

The European Council and the Community Method

José-Manuel Barroso ‘ Speech et the BEPA-Notre Europe seminar on the Community method

European treaties and national democracies

Conference-Debate with Viviane Reding

Europe: a heritage, what responsabilities? Synthesis of the Third Europa Forum

Markets and Government before, during and after the 2007-20xx Crisis” – Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa

We shall bring you our vices

Open Letter to Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council

On the EU2020

Beyond the Wall: Opening address by Joachim Bitterlich

Beyond the Wall: “The state of of the former Yugoslavia”

Achieving a Doubly Green Revolution

What European Policy Outlines for 2020?
