Blog post
Reforming the WTO – with or without the US?
Washington’s continued block of the process to fill vacant Appellate Body seats must be framed in the big picture of systemic trade distortions, says Elvire Fabry, senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute, who argues that what is at stake are the gaps in multilateral rule that allow distortions such as Chinese subsidies to state-owned enterprises. She presents several options to keep dispute settlement functional.
On the same topic, see “Saving the WTO Appellate Body or Returning to the Wild West of Trade?“, Policy Paper by Elvire Fabry.
Threats, blackmail and martial confrontation are President Donald Trump’s policy tools in both geo-economics and geopolitics. But beyond the short-term negotiation strategy of trying to destabilise the other party, will he be able to manage the systemic shockwaves that this is creating?
It is not yet clear whether Trump intends to disengage the US from global value chains by building protectionist walls – from adding investment restrictions and export controls to imposing higher tariffs on imports, targeting China and other countries. Or is he willing to flip up the table of multilateralism to trade more fruitfully in what would have then turned into a Wild West of trade? In both cases, suspicion and fear will develop and could eventually contaminate the world.
Trump was elected on the promise of a new future for the American middle class, increasingly challenged by the development of a global middle class, notably in Asia. Yet, instead of developing welfare-state policies to help people adapt to the new challenges of globalisation – including data transfer, e-commerce and artificial intelligence – he seems happy to increase the distrust in global interdependence, with unknown consequences in the US and abroad.
With the US withdrawing further from multilateralism, one can only hope that Europeans will not also retreat from the promotion of a more regulated globalisation. There is obviously a fatigue about multilateralism. But the cornerstone of the regulation of international trade, namely the World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement mechanism, could soon be blocked if Washington continues to oppose the appointment of new judges to the Appellate Body.
The issue needs to be framed in the big picture of systemic trade distortions. Beyond a mere procedural reform of the Appellate Body, what is at stake here are the gaps in multilateral rules that allow distortions such as Chinese subsidies to state-owned enterprises.
Pushing China to the negotiating table
Will Beijing’s apparent commitment to the multilateral system pave the way for so-called constructive confrontation? Bringing China to the negotiating table remains a challenge. But restoring confidence in fair trade requires strengthening the two legs of the WTO: litigation and negotiation.
The European Commission must be supported in its initiative to create a coalition calling for WTO reform to save the dispute settlement mechanism. The pressure on Beijing to come to the negotiation table could and should be shared among a larger group of countries, as so many – particularly developing economies – will likely be penalised by the bilateral confrontation between the US and China.
A first step in the right direction would consist of countering subsidy notification failures: ensuring that WTO members comply with the requirements on subsidy notifications. Compliance levels with transparency obligations are low and decreasing since 1995 – with the percentage of members reporting subsidies falling from 50% to 38% today.[1]
Amending the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures may well be a long process – in particular, as regards the “less than adequate remunerations” through which the Chinese government supports companies. Europeans and the other members of the WTO cannot accept being held hostage by the US threat to block the dispute settlement mechanism. A strong coalition of WTO members is needed to adopt emergency measures to preserve a functional dispute settlement capacity, without the United States if necessary.
What can be done?
Several options could be considered:
– the “nuclear option” of a qualified majority to appoint new judges to the Appellate Body;
– recourse to an ad hoc arbitration system, already authorised by Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, as a transition phase;
– replicate the Appellate Body’s procedures in a separate agreement, signed by a “coalition of the willing” determined to preserve the balance of international commerce without renegotiating the entire trade regime. This agreement would then take effect only if the US blocked the Appellate Body by not allowing vacancies to be filled before December 2019. This would move the dispute settlement mechanism out of the WTO, but would show willingness to preserve a multilateral system.
As Trump’s vision remains focused on the short term and is primarily influenced by the US mid-term elections in the autumn, it will be up to the other major trading powers, including the EU, to keep multilateral regulation alive.
Elvire Fabry
previously published in Borderlex
[1] “Improving disciplines on subsidies notification”, TN/RL/GEN/188, WTO, 2017.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
The EU’s Art of the Deal: Shaping a unified response to Trump’s tariff threats

Harris vs. Trump on Trade Policy: The Good, the Bad, or Just Ugly?

EU and China between De-Risking and Cooperation: Scenarios by 2035

Mapping the EU’s digital trade

Making migrant returns a pre-condition of trade openness

European Strategic Autonomy
and the US–China Rivalry:

Strategic Autonomy
in Post-Covid Trade Policy

How Effective is Differentiation in the EU Economic Policy Field?

From Expectation to Action

RCEP: the geopolitical impact from a new wave of economic integration

Greening EU Trade 4:
How to “green” trade agreements?

TRUMP’S TRADE WAR: A DELIBERATE CHOICE

Brexit: Breaking the laws of gravity?

Trade in pandemic times

A European Border Carbon Adjustment proposal
Greening EU trade – 3

Covid-19: the urgent need for stricter foreign investment controls

Industrial subsidies are at the heart of the trade war

The WTO in crisis:
Can we do without multilateralism in the digital age?

Greening EU trade policy – 2 :
the economics of trade and environment

Trade war :
bad timing for Brexit ‘take back control’

Guerre commerciale : « L’Europe peut encore peser »

A greener and more inclusive trade policy

Time to green EU trade policy : but how?

Sustaining multilateralism in a multipolar world what france and germany can do to preserve the multilateral order

Brexit: the Knowns Amongst the Unknowns. For the UK, the EU and Third Countries, notably South Korea

What impact would a No Deal Brexit have on European Parliament elections?

EU and US Sanctions: which sovereignty?

Brexit: potential scenarios amid turbulent waters

Saving the WTO Appellate Body or returning to the Wild West of trade?

International Trade: Does Europe Protect?

Transition: the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Brexit Galaxy

Rights and Role of the European Parliament in Common Commercial Policy

Screening foreign direct investment in Europe

Protecting without Protectionism?

Trump Trade: More Bark than Bite?

The revival of the EU at 27

Managing a successful UK-EU divorce, arousing the desire for Union

France: A hotbed of opposition to the TTIP?

TTIP and third states

The EU needs a fresh boost… Fast!

ISDS in TTIP: the devil is in the details

The World Trade Organisation: new issues, new challenges

The TTIP at the forefront of the 21st century international trade system?

The TTIP negotiations: A Pirandello play

Is globalisation in need of global governance?

Think Global – Act European IV. Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

Challenges and prospects of a transatlantic free trade area

Challenges and prospects of a transatlantic free trade area

Challenges and prospects of a transatlantic free trade area

Think Global – Act European IV – Thinking Strategically about the EU’s External Action

Europe’s Trade Strategy: Promise or Peril?

Towards a Transatlantic Market?

How can the EU promote its economic interests with China?

Setting up and governing the euro

Trade Policy in the EU’s Neighbourhood. Ways forward for the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements

The Case for Renewing Transatlantic Capitalism – Final report of the New Atlantic Capitalism project

Pascal Lamy’ speech “Europe in the Global Economy”

The Future of Europe in the New Global Economy

Report on East Asian Integration: Opportunities and Obstacles for Enhanced Economic Cooperation

The European Union and the Doha Round post Hong Kong

Free Trade Today – The Capital Myth by Jagdish Bhagwati

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
L’OMC, paralysée, joue son avenir à Genève

N.Gnesotto – “Quel impact de l’affaire des sous-marins australiens ?”

L’acier et l’aluminium réchauffent les relations transatlantiques
