Policy Paper 11
The Enlarged European Commission
This paper offers a reflection on the implications of enlargement for the European Commission.
It cannot be overstated: the enlargement that took place in May 2004 was a key step in the European Project. Not only because it resulted in a near-complete reunification of the European sub-continent, but also because it has brought significant changes to the Union’s processes and its goals. Unlike the enlargements that came before, this one cannot be regarded as a simple, routine operation. The differences – be they economic, social or political – between the old and new Member States are considerable. The number of newcomers, and the fact that some of those were small countries, has meant that the mechanical adjustments that it was possible to carry out during previous enlargements were this time inadequate.
This is certainly not a new problem: it featured in the first round of institutional discussions following the failed reform attempts in Amsterdam, and were the focus of a great deal of attention when the draft constitution was being drawn up. Until now, however, it has only been approached in a rather dry fashion; how many Members should the Commission comprise, the distribution of Council votes, seats in Parliament, and so forth. Indeed, the dynamic implications of enlargement have barely been discussed, either in terms of the internal functioning of each institution or of the relationship that might transpire between them. Whilst the question is an important one for each of the institutions, it has a particular resonance for the Commission, firstly due to its role as the driving force in the Community system, and secondly because, unlike the other institutions, the Commission’s working methods, and in particular the collegiality principle, might be jeopardised by a badly handled enlargement process.
Notre Europe therefore asked Professor John Peterson, who has written a number of articles on European governance, to reflect on the implications of enlargement for the Commission. The analysis that he gives us in the following pages is stimulating in various ways. He rightly points out that the more heterogeneous Europe becomes, the greater the need for a conductor who can coordinate what each section of the orchestra is playing. This may appear obvious, yet the intergovernmental spirit that has prevailed for a number of years demonstrates that it is nothing of the kind.
Regular readers will undoubtedly be surprised at the uncompromising language. Not everyone will agree with Professor Peterson’s conclusions, in particular his enthusiasm for the open method of coordination. They will, nonetheless, acknowledge that in this uncertain period in Europe’s history, it is essential to reflect on how we can ensure the sustainability of the Community system. This study represents the first high-quality contribution to this debate; there will be others.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
An overhaul of the European fiscal framework?

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

The General Secretariate under the Juncker Commission

CARNETS DE CRISE

100 jours de la Commission :
devenir une puissance verte

« Europe’s New beginnings »

Leçon de démocratie à Bruxelles

Cities in Europe
What EU innovation can do for climate neutrality

The European migration policy:
all about the beginnings

A greener and more inclusive trade policy

A new approach to Eurozone reform

A fresh start in EU asylum policy

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

Objective 2024: better living and working conditions for all europeans

Europeans face the risk of democratic regression: what can be done

Challenges for EU digital and innovation policy

Bolstering EU foreign and security policy in times of contestation

The European Green deal starts with the energy transition

The Seven qualities of a European Commission

United in growing diversity: How the EU takes intercultural relations into account in its Western Balkans enlargement policy

One Hat for Two Heads: A Complex Simplification Process

A Political European Commission through a new organisation “This Time it’s Different”. Really?

Romano Prodi discusses the Commission presidency and the Delors years

Pascal Lamy discusses the Commission presidency and the Delors years

Peter Sutherland discusses the Commission presidency and the Delors years

Etienne Davignon discusses the Commission presidency and the Delors years

The Commission’s leadership and the EU governance

Jacques Delors discusses the Commission presidency and the EU’s institutional functioning

The Juncker Commission: what party balances?

A dual horizon: emerging from the crisis and addressing international challenges

New president, new “Constitution”?

The Commission reform: between efficiency and legitimacy

A new president, for what purpose?

Who will the Commission’s next president be? A multiple-choice question

The EU and enlargement ten years on: success and improvement

The EU and its legislation: prison of peoples or chicken coops?

European Commission and Parliament: what relations?

The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow

What borders for the EU: a variable geometry neighborhood?

“Europe” and its “enlargements”: enough… or do we want more?

Averting two pitfalls: illusion and inertia

Desperately looking for more EU-Turkey geo-political and geo-economic cooperation

The EU, its Neighbours and its Borders

Enlargement: a Tool for the EU, a Prospect for Our Neighbours

President Barroso’s Road Map

Enlargement of Europe: some consequences for France

European “avant-garde”, a new centre of gravity for Europe

Politisation of the Union: the case of the Services Directive

Turkey at the gates of Europe

Enlargement of Another Kind

A driving force despite everything, Franco-German relations and the Enlarged European Union

The EU Institutional Crisis: By the Way… What do the new Member States think?

A new mechanism of enhanced co-operation for the enlarged European Union

Reform of EU policies in the perspective of enlargement and their financial implications

Direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe Union

Adaptation of Cohesion policy to the enlarged Europe and the Lisbon and Göthenburg objectives

Social Europe in the throes of enlargement

Speech of Jacques Delors at the Conference of European Institutes of Statistiques

Direct investement in new Central and Oriental Europe’s member

Enlargement of the European Union: Towards a large area of solidarity and cooperation

An “Avant-garde” driving the European unification process forward

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
L’Union européenne tarde à déployer tout son plan de relance

Thierry Breton: Brussels’ bulldozer digs in against US

EU gas price cap proposal deemed ‘unworkable’ and ‘a joke’, even by advocates
