Policy Paper 8
The world is the stage: a global security strategy for the European Union
The purpose of this paper is to offer an appraisal of Solana’s initial document on European Security and Defence Policy and contribute to the fine-tuning and implementation of the security strategy.
CONCLUSION
The Solana document is an outline ; the next step is a fully- fledged security strategy. That it draws on a comprehensive concept of security is obvious firstly from its assessment of the new security environment, particularly in its designation of poverty and bad governance as being at the heart of problems, and secondly from its call for a strengthening of the international order through policies that make use of the complete range of instruments available to the EU, thus exploiting to the full its variegated facets. The conceptual framework can still be strengthened though, in order to provide a clear and powerful link between diverse external policy areas, between policies vis-à -vis various regions etc. The concept of GPGs can provide the key in this respect.
Further debates on the document, which will hopefully go into more detail as to the instruments required to make the security strategy operational, should take into account the comprehensive approach at that level as well, by detailing the EU’s idea of partnership and conditionality, of institutionalised, rule-based multilateralism, of the use of force etc. With regard to the latter issue, an explicit reference to the authority of the Security Council and rejection of pre-emptive military action seems desirable, in view of the role-model function of the EU. Such a reference would also increase the legitimacy of the EU’s external policy.
It would also seem advisable to soften the emphasis on threats in the current document, which contrasts somewhat with the de facto comprehensive approach that the out line advocates. This comprehensive stamp can be given more substance by further developing the other dimensions of global governance, such as the international economy or legal order. These actually have a higher profile – albeit as instruments of security policy – in the US National Security Strategy. To that end extensive use can be made of existing EU policies and documents in the various areas of external action. Finally, the nature of a renewed transatlantic partnership could be outlined in more detail.
Another important consideration is the legal status to be given to the security strategy. To ensure that it will function effectively as the framework for the whole of the EU’s external policy, it might be worth stipulating that future action plans and CFSP and Community instruments relating to external action must refer to the security strategy. Ideally, the security strategy as framework for external action should be mentioned in the future Constitution. Of course, a comprehensive security strategy contrasts with the US National Security Strategy and certainly with recent US policies. The Solana outline and the National Security Strategy share an emphasis on threats. Threats are the dominant theme throughout the US document ; all policy areas are considered in the light of the fight against proliferation of WMDs and “rogue States’ and particularly of the “war” against terrorism – a struggle that “will be fought on many fronts against a particularly elusive enemy over a long period of time” -, referred to as “our strategic priority”. On the contrary, the Solana document, when it comes to dealing with these threats, advocates a much more positive and comprehensive approach. As one diplomat put it : according to the American document, the world is dangerous ; according to the Solana document, the world is complex.
In the National Security Strategy, the emphasis is on defence policy and the use of military means, including pre-emptively.57 The US document also exudes unilateralism : even though the text is peppered with references to “allies and friends”, it makes it clear that these are expected to accept US leadership and that the US “will be prepared to act apart when our interests and unique responsibilities require”. The EU is barely mentioned. It is primarily seen as “our partner in opening world trade” and even though the US “welcome[s] our European allies” efforts to forge a greater foreign policy and defence identity within the EU”, the basic concern is “to ensure that these developments work with NATO”.
Yet, the EU security strategy should not be interpreted as being directed against the US. On the contrary, the EU and the US should aim to reinforce the transatlantic partnership in all fields of external policy, not just in NATO, in order to put their combined means to use in the most efficient and effective way “for good in the world”, in the words of Javier Solana. But this should be an equitable partnership, one which both partners enter into on the basis of their own priorities and their own distinctive approaches to security. In this respect as well, the first step is to define an EU security strategy.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
European defence Part 2 : Industries

Arsenal Europe, Financing Military Capabilities for Ukraine and EU Member States

European defence Part 1 : budgets

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Europa rüstet auf

Europe trudges ahead with beefing up its security and defence order

L’Ukraine dans l’Otan ? Pourquoi la France a changé d’avis depuis le début de la guerre avec la Russie

Europe de l’armement : première étape vers une défense commune ?

La défense européenne attendra, malheureusement

Air Defender 2023: un exercice aérien hors norme

Les obstacles à une défense européenne autonome face à la puissance de l’Otan

Otan : la Hongrie joue avec les nerfs des Occidentaux

«L’affaiblissement de l’idée de neutralité est une mauvaise nouvelle»

Faut-il abandonner la realpolitik pour une diplomatie morale ?

La guerre en Ukraine dope l’OTAN, pas la défense européenne

Accession à l’Otan : la Suède et la Finlande trouvent la Turquie et la Hongrie sur leur chemin

Guerre en Ukraine : l’Alliance atlantique à l’épreuve du feu russe

Invasion de l’Ukraine : l’Occident déterminé, le Sud ambigu

Ukraine war hands Poland new international role

La Pologne veut devenir nouvelle la première puissance militaire d’Europe

Guerre en Ukraine : la Pologne est-elle en train de devenir un géant militaire ?

La neutralité suisse? Personne n’y croit plus au sein de l’OTAN

Nicole Gnesotto: “L’Europe ne peut pas espérer être un acteur international avec des principes des années 50”

Le budget de l’armée française

L’Europe dans la tourmente

Défense européenne : référendum crucial au Danemark

La Finlande et la Suède viennent de soumettre leur demande d’adhésion à l’OTAN

La Suède et la Finlande dans l’Otan : qu’est-ce que cela va changer pour les deux pays ?

L’Union européenne et ses vulnérabilités révélées par la guerre en Ukraine

Nicole Gnesotto : “La condition d’une Europe militaire efficace est l’accord des pays européens”

Retour aussi sur la vie du président ukrainien Volodymyr Zelensky au début de la guerre

Guerre en Ukraine: «Les Etats-Unis veulent humilier la Russie»

OTAN, G7 et UE. Quelle sera la réplique militaire de l’OTAN ? Quelle sera la stratégie énergétique de l’Europe ?

Energie, agriculture, défense: l’autonomie européenne attendra

La guerre en Ukraine, accélérateur de la défense européenne ?

Europe must do whatever it takes to save Ukraine

La déclaration de Versailles, une feuille de route pour une Europe plus résiliente

Sébastien Maillard : « Un éveil de la puissance européenne »

Ukraine War Galvanizes EU Military Drive

Comment Poutine peut faire advenir l’« Europe-Puissance »

L’Europe au tournant historique de la guerre, avec Nicole Gnesotto

Bruxelles: en attendant une Union de la Défense

Mali : Qui est le groupe paramilitaire russe « Wagner » qui opère en secret ?

Russia-Ukraine crisis: War can take ‘many forms, many battlefields’

France au Sahel : comment rester

« Les Occidentaux doivent réfléchir à une finlandisation de l’Ukraine »

Nicole Gnesotto : “Les Européens n’ont pas d’alternative, la défense de l’Europe c’est l’Otan ou rien”

Ukraine : « Une conscience géostratégique s’éveille en Europe »

Emmanuel Macron’s new vision of Europe begins to take shape

Russie-Otan: comment les relations se sont peu à peu envenimées

L’Union européenne envoie un signal de soutien aux pays de son voisinage oriental

Défense : négligée par l’Amérique, l’Europe doit apprendre à se battre seule

“Sans être un ennemi, la Russie reste une menace pour les pays de l’Otan, mais une menace aux formes variables”

The Brussels Briefing of the Financial Times has taken a look at some of our ideas for the new European Commission

Face à Trump, Poutine et Xi Jinping, l’Europe peut-elle affirmer sa puissance ?

Une Europe de la défense pour défendre quoi ?

Migrants : l’accord européen change-t-il vraiment la donne ?

Stunned US allies seek new friends as Trump tensions mount

Thomas Pellerin-Carlin in Arte Journal about the question of a European defence policy

Nicole Gnesotto on France Culture about the strategic future of the EU on the world stage

Yves Pascouau on RFI: “Sécurité: faut-il rétablir le contrôle aux frontières intérieures de l’UE?”

Enrico Letta in Challenges about the state of the European Union
