Other document
Budgetary discipline and macroeconomic policy in the European Union
Are the stability pact and the Lisbon strategy compatible? Seminar organised in Paris on 8 March 2003 by Notre Europe.
REPORT BY JEAN-LOUIS ARNAUD
FOREWORD BY JACQUES DELORS
At the beginning of the year, many reasons led Notre Europe to consider that, within a constitutional framework, the time had come to reflect on the coherence between the Lisbon strategy signed by the heads of state and government in 2000 and the Stability and Growth Pact that aims at ensuring the stability of the European currency in the short run. This intuition led us to organise last March a seminar of experts on the issue.
The objective was to contribute to a debate about economic governance within an enlarged Europe that, to say the least, was developing slowly, a fact confirmed by the lack of progress made by the Convention on this matter. The most recent facts have confirmed our intuition: The rules of the stability and growth pact were deeply called into question by those that had imposed them, the same that still mention the insufficiency of economic growth, which at least has the merit of showing the hypocrisy of the “stability and growth pact”. Indeed, economic growth is the objective of the Lisbon strategy which, as I realised at the recent Congress of the European Trade Union Confederation, is starting to suffer from a lack of credibility due to the absence of mechanisms to put it in practice.
Therefore, between the stability and growth pact rules, that some qualified as “stupid”, and the demand for growth (which implies employment) that benefits from an indisputable legitimacy in the public opinion, is a new “democratic deficit” that would be very dangerous to play. If this risk was perceived during the seminar, it should be recognised that the possible answers remained rather vague, such as the assessment of the quality of spending or the issue of having the necessary financial resources to put in place the Lisbon strategy.
The clearest conclusion, as invoked by Robert Goebbels, is that we are missing the necessary instruments to lead us, in a credible way, to the prosperity to which citizens aspire. Like him, I think we do not need to reinvent something that works but to finish what was left unfinished: a pact of co-ordination of economic policies and a programme to ensure the financing of trans-European networks which was proposed ten years ago by the White Paper for Growth, Competitiveness and Employment that an enlarged Union will need now even more than before. We have, in a word, to get away from a certain “single thought” to renew with imagination.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Adapting the EU budget to make it fit for the purpose of future enlargements

EU enlargement and the post-2027 Multi-Annual Financial Framework

How stringent would the new Stability and Growth Pact be? And for who?

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
FRANCE : L’UNION DES INDUSTRIES UTILISATRICES D’ÉNERGIE (UNIDEN) APPELLE AU RATIONNEMENT

Peut-on parvenir à une souveraineté économique européenne?

Le nouveau «plan de résilience» teste la solidarité européenne

ÉVÉNEMENTS
EVENTS
Legitimacy Crisis and Autocratic Legalism: The case of the EU Budget

Euroquestions | European Recovery : from planning to implementation

Euroquestion | Quelle gestion de l’endettement public à la suite du Covid ?

Euroquestions | The ongoing negotiations on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and the European Recovery Plan: the state of play [Traduction simultanée vers le français disponible]

Wébinaire | Le Parlement européen, acteur de la réponse à la crise du Covid-19

Day of Progressive Economic Policy

Webinar | The day after the Eurogroup Meeting : outcomes & opportunities

Académie Notre Europe n°5 – Social Europe and Budget

EU Budget 2021-27 : Challenges and opportunities

Florence, 17 October 2019 – The MFF and EU Policie 2021-2027

Brussels, 16th October 2019 – Three solutions to finance the Green Deal

Paris, 12 April 2019 – Session no.6 of the Académie Notre Europe: economic and monetary Union

Brussels, 22 February 2019 – Post-Brexit EU budget: will it meet the challenge of the 21st century?

11 octobre 2018 – La montée des banques promotionnelles en Europe contemporaine: potentiels et pièges

Brussels, 9 October 2018 – What can NPBIs bring to the table for territorial investment?

Strasbourg, 3 October 2018 – Presentation of the report “Making better use of public funding: The role of NPBIs in the next EU budget”

Paris, 18 September 2018 – Towards a Juncker Plan closer to the territories?

Paris, 12 June 2018 – Hearing by the Special Rapporteur on Budget for European affairs of the French National Assembly

Paris, 6 June 2018 – What territorial cohesion to build in Europe?

Brussels, 6 June 2018 – Cohesion Policy and the new MFF

Paris, 28 May 2018 – Budget meetings: the new EU financial framework

Budapest, 24 May 2018 – The Money Trail to Europe’s Future: the Multi-Annual Financial Framework and the EU’s priorities post-2020

Nicosia, 16 March 2018 – The political landscape of EMU reform

Sofia, 9 March 2018 – The future of the EU budget

Brussels, 22 November 2017 – The future of the European budget

Brussels, 25 September 2017 – Conference on the Future of EU Finances

Paris, 21 July 2017 – The future of the Eurozone and the Multiannual Financial Framework
