Policy paper 194
Defending Europe to Defend Real Sovereignty
The European Union is facing major challenges which expose its weaknesses, in particular in several sovereign areas. In this Policy Paper, Thierry Chopin states the necessary in-depth reforms, while warning against national retrenchment.
In this Policy Paper, Thierry Chopin, research director of the Fondation Robert Schuman, analyses the need of a clear political project, without going back to the “Europe of the past” and without coming to terms with national retrenchment.
?1. The ineffective and perilous gamble of going back to the “Europe of the past”
The European Union is facing major challenges (financial and economic crisis, terrorism, migration crisis, Brexit, rise in populism and extremism) which expose its weaknesses, in particular in several sovereign areas. In-depth reforms are necessary, and national retrenchment will bring about more new problems rather than real solutions.
2. “Sovereign Europe”: a new political project for the EU
After peace and the market, the current European situation involves putting forward a clear political message on what the EU’s foundations are and its legitimacy in dealing with the present challenges. This means identifying the collective objectives that unify Europeans, and the common interests and goods that require common action (currency, financial stability, control of the EU’s external borders, foreign and security policy, etc.). In these areas, the EU and its member states must jointly exercise sovereign powers. Coordination of member states’ resources must be enhanced in order to tackle the current challenges, both on a European level (justice, police, intelligence, the fight against terrorism) and an international level (diplomacy, defence).
Given the joint exercise of sovereign prerogatives that this project implies, it is not likely that it could bring together all EU member states, at least not initially. All future EU policies cannot concern all member states in the same way, which must result in cooperation being negotiated between States in order to make progress in certain areas. This is what the “differentiated” Europe project proposes.
Differentiation is, however, criticised and may give rise to some risks if deployed poorly. It is therefore of the utmost importance to ensure that differentiated integration is an open process and that, should it be subject to conditions (as is participation in the Eurozone), this is legitimate and transparent.
This Policy Paper is also available in French.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Montenegro’s new government: marching towards the European Union

Une victoire à la Pyrrhus des « illibéraux » ouvre la voie à un réengagement européen de la Pologne

European elections 2024: guidelines

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Hors-série – Démocratie à l’ère Trump

Soupçons d’ingérence en Roumanie : la Cour constitutionnelle annule l’élection présidentielle

Deux mois de changement de pouvoir en Pologne : la Tusk force

ÉVÉNEMENTS
EVENTS
Le Grand Continent | L’Union européenne doit-elle s’élargir ? [FR]

Euroquestions #66 | Between the Slovakian and Polish elections, where is Central Europe heading? [FR]

Inaugural session of the Académie Notre Europe | “Political and institutional Europe” [FR]

Euroquestions #64 | A look back at the 2023 State of the Union speech [FR]

Euroquestions #62 | One year ahead of the 2024 European elections

Les Rencontres du Grand Continent au Sénat | European democracy in the face of crises: what role for parliaments? [FR]

Inaugural session of Academie Notre Europe : Political and institutional Europe

Euroquestions | Swedish General Election : towards another deadlock ? [FR]

Jacques Delors Conference: The Promise of Europe [FR]

Euroquestions | French presidential election: what impact for Europe? [FR]

Mardi du Grand Continent : How to interpret the results of the first round? [FR]

Euroquestions | Hungarian parliamentary election : a high-stakes election for Europe [FR]

Conference TEDx Lannion | Europe with 3-Ds [FR]

Euroquestions | Représentation et participation : réinventer la démocratie en Europe

Quel avenir pour le dialogue transatlantique après l’élection de Joe Biden ?

Webinaire | The Future EU – US Trade Relationship

L’enseignement scolaire de l’Histoire

Soirée électorale : Elections américaines, sociétés, imaginaires

Differentiated Integration and the Future of Europe: Promises, Pitfalls, Pathways

Euroquestions | Relance et puissance : mots d’ordre de la rentrée européenne

Conférence
CEPS Ideas Lab

Aix-en-Provence, 27th of September 2019 – European elections 2019: what impact on the European Union?

Budapest, 10 to 14 July – Budapest European Agora

Paris, 21 June 2019 – Session 8: Europe of the Futur

Brussels, 21 May 2019 – Europe after Sibiu: towards differentiated integration?

Deauville, 27 April 2019 — Deauville Days : The future of Europe

Nice, 24 April 2019 — A new horizon for Europe : Renaissance public meeting

Paris, 19 February 2019 – Democracy in Europe: Interference and misinformation at the dawn of the European elections

Paris, 8 February 2019 – Session n°4 of the Académie Notre Europe : Europe of democracy

Paris, 13 novembre 2018 – Quel rôle pour l’économie sociale dans le futur de l’Europe ?

Paris, 7 September 2018 – Model European Union Paris

Paris, 11 July 2018 – Citizen consultation : what is Europe purpose?

Paris, 20 June 2018 – Future Europe

Prague, 19 June 2018 – Europe of Citizens? Public Perceptions of the EU and its Reform

Paris, 6 June 2018 – Fact-finding mission on Europe “Achieve the democratic refounding process”

Strasbourg, 1st June 2018 – Europe on trial: Who’s to blame for the break-up?

Paris, 18 May 2018 – One Vision: Awaken the European spirit

Freiburg, 26 April 2018 – 11th Franco-German cultural meetings

Paris, 9 March 2018 – Académie: Democracy in Europe

London, 16 February 2018 – Reconnecting the EU with its Citizens

Paris, 7 February 2018 – 59th Europartenaires Club

Paris, 7 February 2018 – Luncheon of the France-Italy Association
