Blog post 94
Eurozone and democracy(ies) : a misleading debate
The reflection on democracy in the eurozone is often established on inappropriate bases, then generating a misleading debate whose issues need to be clarified: it is the purpose of this policy paper by our director Yves Bertoncini.
The reflection on democracy in the eurozone is often established on inappropriate bases, then generating a misleading debate whose issues need to be clarified: it is the purpose of this policy paper by our director Yves Bertoncini.
In this perspective, this policy paper focuss on four series of political analysis :
1.
The intense debates generated by the eurozone crisis contribute to the
democratic nature of decision-making at European level, whose foundations have
to be better analyzed.
2.
The relations between the EMU and its Member States correspond to four
different political regimes, whose impact on sovereignty is extremely variable.
3.
Three main types of powers are exercised in the eurozone framework, in different democratic backgrounds.
4. There
is a need to consolidate the democratic dimension of the eurozone governance.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
The war in Ukraine:
what are the consequences for European organisations?

After Brexit, euro-denominated derivatives transactions should leave the City

The Euro as seen by citizens who do not yet have it

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
L’Irlandais Paschal Donohoe reconduit à la présidence de l’Eurogroupe

Il y a vingt ans, l’arrivée des premiers euros

« L’hétérogénéité croissante de la zone euro menace sa cohésion »
