Policy paper 198
Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe
Published on the ocasion of the 30 years of Erasmus, this policy paper by Yves Bertoncini and Sofia Fernandes presents an overview of the evolution of the Erasmus programme since 1987 and highlights the success of the “Erasmus spirit”, which is reflected in the Europeanisation of university courses and the development of non-academic mobility.
30 years after it was launched by the European Commission led by President Jacques Delors in June 1987, the “Erasmus” programme has become one of the most emblematic “brands” of the EU, a legacy that deserves to flourish giving a new impetus to youth mobility in Europe. While many technical and statistical assessments have already been carried out to evaluate Erasmus’ impact on the employability of its beneficiaries or their open-mindedness about European citizenship, it might be worthwhile, on the occasion of the programme’s 30th anniversary, to put into historical perspective its political repercussions and to outline its future.
This policy paper by Yves Bertoncini, our director, and Sofia Fernandes, senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute, presents an overview of the quantitative and qualitative evolution of the Erasmus programme over the last three decades. Secondly, we will highlight the success of the “Erasmus spirit”, which is reflected in the Europeanisation of university courses and the development of non-academic mobility, an indispensable component to diversifying the profile of beneficiaries of the EU’s mobility programmes.
1. 3244 pioneers received Erasmus grants in 19971998. Today almost 300000 young academics benefit every year. Erasmus has expanded considerably since 1987 and has paved the way for the creation of other mobility programmes aimed at pupils in secondary education, those in vocational education and training, volunteers, etc. In 2014, all these European mobility programmes were brought together within the framework of a new “”Erasmus+” programme.
2. Erasmus should be perceived and promoted as part of a broader Europeanisation of academic curricula, which is increasingly reflected in the possibility of pursuing all of one’s education and training in another EU country (rather than in “exchanges”). Currently, 10 % of European graduates have a study period abroad.
3. Further efforts are needed as member states have set themselves the target of 20 % of tertiary graduates completing part of their studies abroad by 2020.
4. It is also necessary to ensure qualitative improvements, in particular in terms of the target audience. Only 1% of European apprentices (for a target of 6% by 2020) are currently opting for a stay abroad during their training.
5. Last but not least, encouraging young people’s mobility in Europe must be achieved through increased support for experiences outside the formal education system, which may be more attractive to their potential beneficiaries, not least because they are less “constraining” than a study period in another EU country.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
Parents’ leaves in the EU

Can a minimum price on carbon accelerate the adoption of clean technologies?

One step closer to adequate minimum wages in the EU

Les projets importants d’intérêt européen commun (PIIEC)

What the EU budget can and cannot do in response to the war in Ukraine

Welcoming Ukrainian refugees in the EU

European values. A debate to be clarified, a struggle to be fought

Happy birthday and best wishes, Erasmus!

From words to action

IS IT TIME FOR A EUROPEAN UNEMPLOYMENT (RE)INSURANCE?

CONTINUING EDUCATION, ACCORDING TO JACQUES DELORS, THE CATALYST OF A CHANGING SOCIETY

High energy prices. Russia fights back?

Addressing the climate and social emergencies with minimum energy performance standards

A Social Climate Fund for a fair energy transition

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

European Union governance in response to crises

History of a breakdown:Fidesz’s departure from the EPP group at the European Parliament

Toward a European homelessness policy

The Porto Social Summit: turning principles into actions

Towards a European individual learning account

What is left of the “Visegrád Group”?

Europe needs to innovate
to become a front-runner in the global green economy race

Europe needs a political strategy to end energy poverty

Towards an individual right to adult learning for all europeans

Towards an individual right to adult learning for all europeans

POWER STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL ON THE EU BUDGET: WINNERS OR LOSERS?

A move towards adequate minimum wages in the European Union?

Abolition of the death penalty: a european exception to be promoted

SURE or the EU to aid European workers

Joining forces to ensure a green and social recovery

Building a clean mobility system in times of COVID-19

Harmful tax competition

A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

Combating poverty in Europe

L’Europe sans charbon

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

Overcoming covid-19 crises
by building a clean and resilient Europe

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?

Representation and participation

MFF negotiations: towards the end?

Making the Green Deal a European success
Coalition, narrative, flagships

Le choix des gouvernants de l’Union,
pour un équilibre entre démocratie et diplocratie

‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity

Europeans face the risk of democratic regression: what can be done

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

Objective 2024: better living and working conditions for all europeans

Innovation for the energy & climate transition

European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?

Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme

Climate Change: at the Heart of a New European Political Balance

Just energy transition: a reality test in Europe’s coal regions

Making the European energy transition socially sustainable

Achieving a european minimum wage? Clarifications on the issue

Appartenance assumée, adhésion réservée : évolution des opinions publiques sur l’Union européenne – de la crise à nos jours

“Illiberal Democracy” or “Majoritarian Authoritarianism”? Contribution to the analysis of populisms in Europe

The reform of the EMU: what social dimension?

Le troisième acte de l’histoire européenne

European unemployment insurance: what citizens really think

The revenge of the nation: political passions in contemporary Poland

Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?

A French-German Cooperation Agenda for the Energy Transition in Europe

Towards a European Transition Support Fund

Social Europe: From Slogan to Reality

InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?

For an “Erasmus teens”

Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget

EU’s multi-level system: Strengthening parliamentary voices

Family allowances: their amount should not depend on the country where the child lives

Invigorating European Democracy

What is our Ambition for the European Labour Authority?

Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution

Towards a more democratic European Union

The Rule of Law under Threat: What Can Europe Do?

Erasmus: Renewing the Original Ambitions

Ireland on the rocky road to Brexit

European Mobility Programmes: Championing European Identity?

The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility

EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?

Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”

Democratic Crises in the EU: Towards “New Frontiers”

The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding

Posted Workers: How to Ensure a Fair Mobility?

United in diversity: Anthems and flags of the European Union

Faces on Divides: Citizen Debates in Le Mans and Toulouse

German Election: Last Vote to Make Europe

The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?

Europe, Germany, France: Evolution of Public Opinions

European public opinion and the EU following the peak of the migration crisis

European Democracy: What Are the Next Challenges

Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?

ENABLE.EU: Literature review

The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?

Enrico Letta about the main issues of the June 2017 EU Council

Making the Energy Transition a European Success

Making Social Europe a Reality for European Citizens

The European Energy Union: A Chance for France

French and Europeans: Stronger Together!

Defending Europe to Defend Real Sovereignty

Social Networks and Populism in the EU : Comparative Study

National Referendums on EU Issues: from Clarification to Frustration

The Awakening

Living Together Facing Fears: the French Political Dilemma

Clean energy for all Europeans: time to deliver!

Faces on divides: mid-term Czech MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides: mid-term Greek MEPs’ votes

Should Europe Become the World Leader of Renewable Energy?

Narrating Social Europe: the Search for progress in the “Age of Delors”

Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?

Faces on divides: mid-term French MEPs’ votes

Faces on divides : MEPs votes Mid-term assessment

Europe in search of Europeans: The road of identity and myth

Yes, we are European!

For an ambitious Europe
