Other document
Reaction of Loukas Tsoukalis to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty
Moravcsik is absolutely right in observing that the European constitutional project failed to mobilize citizens across our member countries and generate support for further integration. And how could it?
Moravcsik is absolutely right in observing that the European constitutional project failed to mobilize citizens across our member countries and generate support for further integration. And how could it?
The term constitution is clearly a misnomer, changes in Council voting procedures and rotating presidencies may be a step in the direction of better delivery but hardly the stuff that excites most people, while the policy part of the old treaty remained virtually the same. Practical changes were presented as a major political project, and they backfired – at best, they met with indifference.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
The Constitutional Treaty and the June Summit: A way forward?
How to Explain the Unexpected: An Assessment of the French Constitutional Referendum
Leading from behind: Britain and the European Constitutional Treaty
Can Europe’s Foreign Policy rekindle the Constitutional Process?
Constitutional referendum in France: a mid-term assessment
Landscape after the battle
Letter to our European friends who want to Vote not
Draft Constitution? Why a “rear guard” should be established
The European constitution – a step in before for the EU
What can we learn from the Collapse of European Constitutional Project? A Response to Eight Critics
Plan B: How to Rescue the European Constitution
Reaction of Jeremy A. Rabkin to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty
Reaction of Mark N. Franklin to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty
Reaction of Giandomenico Majone to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty
The Constitutional Treaty: What Now?
The European Constitution and deliberation: the Example of deliberative focus groups ahead of the French Referendum of 29 May 2005
The French “no” vote of 29 May 2005: understand, act
“The Constitution, a step forward for the European Union” intervention by Jacques Delors
Ratification and Revision of the Consitutional Treaty
A new institutional equilibrium and collective sovereignty