Report
Reforming Europe’s governance
Yves Bertoncini and António Vitorino formulate analyses and recommendations both on the European Union in the broader sense, sometimes judged to be too pernickety and “unintelligible,” and its “institutional triangle” frequently being considered to be excessively opaque, as well as on the Economic and Monetary Union, marked most recently by the arrival on the scene of the “Troika” and by the conclusion of the “fiscal compact”.
If the challenges facing the EU demand, first and foremost, detailed political responses, it is essential that the European institutions whose aim is to come up with those political responses are fully legitimate and effective, and that the “European federation of nation states” evoked by Jacques Delors functions more harmoniously.
It’s with this in mind that Yves Bertoncini and António Vitorino formulate analyses and recommendations both on the European Union in the broader sense, sometimes judged to be too pernickety and “unintelligible,” and its “institutional triangle” frequently being considered to be excessively opaque, as well as on the Economic and Monetary Union, marked most recently by the arrival on the scene of the “Troika” and by the conclusion of the “fiscal compact”. These analyses and recommendations take into account the major progress associated with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon which, like the previous treaties, has improved the EU’s functioning, without necessarily including all of the potential institutional and political reforms.
According to Yves Bertoncini and António Vitorino, reforming “Europe’s governance” supposes to better legitimate the exercise of the EU and the EMU’s powers, to clarify the actions of and interactions between the European institutions, as well as to modify their internal functioning. Reforming “Europe’s governance” also implies promoting adjustments in the short and medium terms, above all regarding the interventions and organisation of the European institutions, and concerning certain points on the drafting of the Community treaties, in order to “consolidate political union” and to “complete the EMU”.
The set of changes proposed by Yves Bertoncini and Antonio Vitórino do not involve an “institutional big bang” or a “big federal leap”, but constitute a number of pragmatic, democratic and beneficial improvements for European governance, which will enable the EU to better meet the expectations of its member states and citizens.
This Study is also available in French (full text) and German (summary)
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
How stringent would the new Stability and Growth Pact be? And for who?

The tools for protecting the EU budget from breaches of the rule of law

Macro-economic impact of the EU Recovery Funds

Declining birth rate in Europe

Newsletter June 2022

[FR] Spitzenkandidaten : oui ou non ?

THE NEXT REVISION OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION AND THE EU BUDGET GALAXY

Belonging to Europe

From words to action

Programme de travail 2022.
L’Europe à clarifier, approfondir et imaginer

A move towards adequate minimum wages in the European Union?

The European recovery plan as a breakthrough for green innovation? Challenges and opportunities for an innovative green recovery

Message for the JDI’s 25th anniversary celebration. Thinking Europe as ours

TOWARDS A EUROPEAN HEALTH UNION

CONTINUING EDUCATION, ACCORDING TO JACQUES DELORS, THE CATALYST OF A CHANGING SOCIETY

FRENCH-STYLE EUROSCEPTICISM

The Euro as seen by citizens who do not yet have it

Putting the cart before the horse? PERSPECTIVES ON A POTENTIAL ETS ON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

The budgetary stick to the rescue of the rule of law?

A historic agreement, to be improved and implemented

An ambitious recovery budget, tough negotiations ahead

French public opinion and Europe
between distrust and ambivalence

The EU budget and COVID: We need a “plan B”

Covid-19 and the Mobilisation of Public Development Banks in the EU

Tackling the coronavirus crisis:
how can the EU budget help?

Fiscal policy-making in the time of Coronavirus

Coronavirus
krach financier et krach politique

Corona: A European Safety Net for the Fiscal Response

The Member State compartment of the InvestEU Fund:
how does it work? Will it fly?

MFF negotiations: towards the end?

Élargissement :
Faire tomber le mur du rejet

Reflections on “the end of the cold war?”

30 ans après la chute du Mur de Berlin :
Penser les frontières de l’Union européenne

‘No deal’ Brexit and the EU budget:
beware the risk for EU unity

An EU budget in support of the next commission’s agenda

Innovation for the energy & climate transition

European Budget 2021-2027: how to escape from “business as usual”?

Budget européen, retrouver le sens du long terme

The reform of the EMU: what social dimension?

2019, année pour « Nous, Européens »

Negotiating the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework in an electoral year: which consequences?

Europe : la nécessité d’agir

InvestEU Fund: A Rebranded Juncker Fund?

Es ist Zeit

Economic and Monetary Union: past and present

From Trump to the European New Deal

The future of the Eurozone: cross-perspective from France and Germany

Making better use of public funding: The role of national promotional banks and institutions in the next EU budget

The European ambition of President Macron and the reactions in Europe to his project

No Escape from Politics: four tests for a successful fiscal instrument in the Euro area

Reinforcing the EU Budget with a fossil-fuel contribution

Looking for the silver bullet – A guide to the ESM debate

The Next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and its Flexibility

EU budget: What’s the Cost of Europe?

Understanding the “Brexit Divorce Bill”

The possible impact of Brexit on the EU budget and CAP funding

Juncker’s Last Hurrah

The EU as a 3-D Power: Should Europe Spend More on Diplomacy, Development and Defence?

Are the spending priorities of euro-area countries converging?

The future of the European budget: What does the Commission’s White Paper mean for EU finances?

Making the Energy Transition a European Success

Extending Erasmus: a new impetus for youth mobility in Europe

Brexit and the EU budget: threat or opportunity?

Public Sector Reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it

EU Economic Policy Coordination

Automatic stabilisers for the euro area: what is on the table?

Investment in Europe: Making the best of the Juncker Plan

Is there an alternative to the European economic policy? The European Parliament response

Germany and the stability of the EMU

Federalising the Eurozone: Towards a true European budget?

“Shared sovereignty for monitoring borders already shared”

What would a European finance minister do? A proposal

Sharing solidarity and sovereignty better: transcending “euroscoliosis”

After the Greek psychodrama, what improvements for the EMU?

After the Greek deal: why it is urgent to complete EMU

The EU and Greece: exiting “IMF – Europe” rather than the Euro

On asylum and the euro: displaying solidarity is in our own interest

Improving EMU: Our recommendations for the debate on the five presidents report

Repair and prepare: Strengthening Europe’s economies after the crisis

A new road map for the EU

Out of concern for Europe

Is Europe failing?

The adjustements to the EU budget

What political and institutional evolutions for the EU and the EMU?

National budgets and European surveillance: Shedding light on the debate

Promoting structural reforms in the euro area: what for and how?

20 years “core Europe”

Post-election EU: Ask for the programme!

Adjustment programmes in the euro area: mission accomplished?

Who calls the shots in the euro area? “Brussels” or the member states?

25 years after the Delors Report: what lessons for economic and monetary union?

The “stupidity pact” is not stable

The unhappy state of the Union

Completing the Economic and Monetary Union

European elections: full steam ahead!

Which financial instrument to facilitate structural reforms in the euro area?

Deepening the EMU: How to maintain and develop the European social model?

Endowing the EMU with a Social Dimension

Towards a Euro Union

An Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the EMU

Blueprint for a Cyclical Shock Insurance in the euro area

A social dimension for the EMU: why and how?

The way out of the Cyprus economic crisis

Non-Community European spending

Beyond the Troika: which divides and faces for the EU?

Eurozone and democracy(ies) : a misleading debate

The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow

Rethinking the EMU and making Greater Europe positive again

Fear not, we will get there!

Europe between renewal and decline

Leading Europe from the front

Rebuilding Greater Europe

EU budget: the path to an agreement

The role and place of Parliaments in a genuine Economic and Monetary Union

The parliaments of the EU and the governance of the EMU

EU and growth: three pacts rather than one

European budget 2014-2020: seven years of bad luck?

Is the stupidity pact still stable?

How to maintain hard capabilities in times of budget cuts?

The EU budget: taking a second look
