Blog post 226

EU’s multi-level system: Strengthening parliamentary voices

Two scrutiny relationships in the EU’s multi-level system are particularly complex: National parliaments are monitoring the activities of the European Commission, and the European Parliament has started to act as a public forum that does not hesitate to pick a fight against any individual national government. In both cases, parliamentary voices can articulate their ideas, concerns and general views. Taking the European Parliament’s Rangel report and recent interparliamentary developments as a starting point, this Policy Paper puts forward six recommendations to enhance the ways in which parliamentary voices are heard in the EU’s multi-level system.

| 12/06/2018

Although citizens’ trust in political institutions and the European Union as a whole has recovered slightly, better parliamentary scrutiny can reduce the perceived democratic deficit of the EU’s multi-level system. This Policy Paper, written by Valentin Kreilinger, research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institut – Berlin, is guided by the principles of building upon current practices and avoiding Treaty change. It recommends to

  1. refrain from assigning any collective decision-making or veto powers to national parliaments,
  2. acknowledge the diversity of political views within parliamentary chambers at the national and the European level,
  3. put a green card procedure for suggesting legislative initiatives to the European Commission into practice,
  4. extend the eight-week standstill period in the Early Warning Mechanism through a technical gimmick,
  5. manage the European Parliament’s plenary debate invitations to national leaders free from party-political considerations
  6. and create the foundations for lively and visible plenary debates with national leaders in the European Parliament.




Voir plus
Load more



Voir plus
Load more



Voir plus
Load more