Other document
Reaction of Pepper D. Culpepper and Archon Fung to Andrew Moravcsik’s article on the collapse of the Constitutional treaty
Crisply reasoned argumentation, even when it is dead wrong, is always welcome in the debate on the alleged crisis of democracy in the European Union. Andrew Moravcsik’s recent contribution is certainly well argued, and we agree wholeheartedly with his dismissal of the recent European Constitution as a legally unnecessary project driven primarily by public relations motives. His lessons for what we can learn from that debacle, however, are questionable.
Crisply reasoned argumentation, even when it is dead wrong, is always welcome in the debate on the alleged crisis of democracy in the European Union. Andrew Moravcsik’s recent contribution is certainly well argued, and we agree wholeheartedly with his dismissal of the recent European Constitution as a legally unnecessary project driven primarily by public relations motives.
His lessons for what we can learn from that debacle, however, are questionable. We question two central elements in particular: its basis in empirical political science and the implications of those findings for questions of democracy.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION IN A TROUBLED 2020
the French and the environment
French public opinion and Europe
between distrust and ambivalence
MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
“La Ue metta direttamente i soldi nelle tasche di imprese e cittadini”
Europe’s necessary return to France
“les opinions publiques au sein des 27 pays de l’UE sont devenues plus favorables à leur adhésion”
