The Jacques Delors Institute, in partnership with the Gulbenkian Foundation, organises a debate about the European Union tools to face the threats which European democracy and rule of law are undergoing.
For the first time in History, the European Commission has activated Article 7 of the Lisbon treaty against Poland. This article foresees in particular substantial sanctions that can go as far as preventing the incriminated State to vote. Triggering this procedure is unprecedented and underlines the alarming political climate certain democracies are facing these days. Indeed, beyond the questioning of judiciary reforms in Poland, Viktor Orban’s Hungary, or, more recently, the harming of the rule of law during the Catalan crisis, are also in the spotlight. Confronted to these risks, and more generally to the rise of nationalist movements, the European Union is equipped with mechanisms aiming at guaranteeing the integrity of democratic values and the rule of law on which it is founded. Article 7 is certainly one of them, but its complex procedure, requiring the Member States unanimity, is likely to reduce the European institutions reaction to a verbal threat, and would highlight their powerlessness. Therefore, how can the EU remain a guardian of democratic values, react efficiently when they are threaten, and promote them? Are the European tools adequate, shall we rethink their implementation or consider alternative measures?
Find more information in the programme.
For the first time in History, the European Commission has activated Article 7 of the Lisbon treaty against Poland. This article foresees in particular substantial sanctions that can go as far as preventing the incriminated State to vote. Triggering this procedure is unprecedented and underlines the alarming political climate certain democracies are facing these days. Indeed, beyond the questioning of judiciary reforms in Poland, Viktor Orban’s Hungary, or, more recently, the harming of the rule of law during the Catalan crisis, are also in the spotlight. Confronted to these risks, and more generally to the rise of nationalist movements, the European Union is equipped with mechanisms aiming at guaranteeing the integrity of democratic values and the rule of law on which it is founded. Article 7 is certainly one of them, but its complex procedure, requiring the Member States unanimity, is likely to reduce the European institutions reaction to a verbal threat, and would highlight their powerlessness. Therefore, how can the EU remain a guardian of democratic values, react efficiently when they are threaten, and promote them? Are the European tools adequate, shall we rethink their implementation or consider alternative measures?
Find more information in the programme.
Lisbonne
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
EU ENLARGEMENT AND PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE IN THE NEXT MFF

Une victoire à la Pyrrhus des « illibéraux » ouvre la voie à un réengagement européen de la Pologne

The power struggle between the European Union and Hungary

History of a breakdown:Fidesz’s departure from the EPP group at the European Parliament

Crisis Notebook

The “Article 7” proceedings against Poland and Hungary: what concrete effects ?

“Illiberal Democracy” or “Majoritarian Authoritarianism”? Contribution to the analysis of populisms in Europe

The revenge of the nation: political passions in contemporary Poland

La Cour de Justice de l’UE et la Pologne : premiers frémissements

They Love Me, They Love Me Not, They Love Me a Little: Public Opinion and the European Union in the Visegrad Countries

The Rule of Law under Threat: What Can Europe Do?

Think Global – Act European (TGAE) The Contributions of European Think Tanks to the Trio Presidency of the EU

Think Global – Act European III (TGAE III). The contribution of 16 European think tanks to the Polish, Danish and Cypriot EU Trio Presidency.

Synthesis Report of the TGAE’s presentation, 15 June 2011, Brussels

Think Global – Act European II – The contribution of 14 European think tanks on the EU Trio Presidency.

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
« Pologne, la puissance européenne de 2025 ? »

Conseil de l’UE : pourquoi la présidence de la Pologne sera particulièrement scrutée

Viktor Orbán, central à l’internationale, marginal en Europe ?
