Other document
Politicising the European debate
Despite the uncertain fate of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European elections of June 2009 remain on the agenda. They are of fundamental importance for the direction of the European project in the next five years. For this reason Notre Europe wishes to underline the position of its European Steering Committee, which dates from 1998. This advocates linking the choice of Commission president to the results of European elections, with each political grouping proposing a candidate during the campaign. The text introducing the position, signed by our president, Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, explains the significance of such a move with a reasoning unsettlingly relevant to today’s situation.
Despite the uncertain fate of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European elections of June 2009 remain on the agenda. They are of fundamental importance for the direction of the European project in the next five years. For this reason Notre Europe wishes to underline the position of its European Steering Committee, which dates from 1998. This advocates linking the choice of Commission president to the results of European elections, with each political grouping proposing a candidate during the campaign. The text introducing the position, signed by our president, Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, explains the significance of such a move with a reasoning unsettlingly relevant to today’s situation. “Politicising the European debate”, as the title of the ESC’s position proposes, is now a matter of urgency. It will once again be on the agenda of the Committee next meeting, on 7-8 November in Paris.
Available in German.
SUR LE MÊME THÈME
ON THE SAME THEME
PUBLICATIONS
What’s happening in the European Parliament?

Lessons learned from the implementation of crisis response tools at EU level

Commonalities and fault lines in EU economic policy visions

MÉDIAS
MEDIAS
Soupçons d’ingérence en Roumanie : la Cour constitutionnelle annule l’élection présidentielle

Le Parlement européen valide la Commission von der Leyen II

Une majorité d’eurodéputés retiennent du rapport d’Enrico Letta le besoin de réduire la bureaucratie

ÉVÉNEMENTS
EVENTS
Euroquestions #66 | Between the Slovakian and Polish elections, where is Central Europe heading? [FR]

Inaugural session of the Académie Notre Europe | “Political and institutional Europe” [FR]

Euroquestions #64 | A look back at the 2023 State of the Union speech [FR]

Euroquestions #62 | One year ahead of the 2024 European elections

Les Rencontres du Grand Continent au Sénat | European democracy in the face of crises: what role for parliaments? [FR]

Académie Notre Europe | Session in Brussels [FR]

Euroquestions | Swedish General Election : towards another deadlock ? [FR]

Euroquestions | French presidential election: what impact for Europe? [FR]

Mardi du Grand Continent : How to interpret the results of the first round? [FR]

Euroquestions | Hungarian parliamentary election : a high-stakes election for Europe [FR]

Delivering the 2021-27 MFF and NGEU: How to match strategy, resources and expectations?

Quel avenir pour le dialogue transatlantique après l’élection de Joe Biden ?

Webinaire | The Future EU – US Trade Relationship

Soirée électorale : Elections américaines, sociétés, imaginaires

Wébinaire | Le Parlement européen, acteur de la réponse à la crise du Covid-19

EU Budget 2021-27 : Challenges and opportunities

Académie Notre Europe – Europe of human rights and values

Paris, 21 May 2019 – Political power balance in France and Europe before European elections

Wavre, 16 May 2019 – The most important European elections of the history?

Paris, 5 February 2019 – What is the modernity of the spirit of the founders?
